Dark Side of the Kernebone
Posted by Mark Bahnisch on Saturday, December 18, 2004
Some of us were wondering in the thread about the SBS Movie Show what Zoe was on about when she compared Fenella Kernebone to Roger Waters. She’s now provided a case for Ms Kernebone to answer at her blog Crazybrave. Go see for yourself and decide if Zoe’s onto something here…
This entry was posted on Saturday, December 18th, 2004 at 11:02 PM and filed under Films and TV, Uncategorized.
Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed.
Apologies. Comments and trackbacks are both currently closed.
I’m staying with the “Fenella is cute” opinion… Roger Waters on the other hand is most not cute…
Posted on 18-Dec-04 at 11:25 pm | PermalinkLooking like Roger Waters doesn’t make you ugly. I think she’s beautiful.
Posted on 19-Dec-04 at 9:25 am | PermalinkLooking like Roger Waters doesn’t make you ugly.
It does if you’re Roger Waters.
Posted on 19-Dec-04 at 1:07 pm | PermalinkMind you, he appears to have improved with age. He’s no longer quite as odd-looking as he was in the photos you see of Pink Floyd from the 60s and 70s.
I saw Roger Waters at the Ent. Centre during his tour a couple of years ago.
Indeed, he’s nowhere near as ugly as he used to be, and surprisingly turned out to be a charismatic and highly entertaining performer.
Fenella is easily the least awful of the movie show crowd. What’s with megan and the warts?
Posted on 19-Dec-04 at 7:07 pm | PermalinkIt’s as simple as this:
Roger Waters = ugly man (sorry, Zoe, you’re both crazy and brave to argue with this)
Fenella Kernebone = beautiful woman
No similarity.
Much better photo of Fenella at the Movie Show website:
http://www.sbs.com.au/movieshow/index.php3?action=presenters
Posted on 20-Dec-04 at 7:44 am | PermalinkI’d bang Fenella in a heartbeat.
Posted on 17-Mar-05 at 11:37 pm | Permalink