<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gender division of labour in the home - the column</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Gruen</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-175819</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Gruen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 13:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-175819</guid>
		<description>I wonder if I write this here, rather than put up another mini post, people will see it in the sidebar of recent comments and read it.  Let's see. . . .

I thought of an important example that I left out.  Driving.  I'm dead sure that men drive more than women - when there's a chance for either to drive, though I don't know the numbers.  But is it work?  Or is sitting in the passenger seat less pleasant - and so more like work?  

If anyone knows the numbers I'd be interested to hear.  

And I think of cooking like this too.  I'd rather cook than just eat.  Unfortunately my wife is pretty fastidious and there's lots of things I cook that she won't eat.  She also fears finding a hair in the food - something that there's probably a slightly higher chance of finding if I cook than she cooks.  So she cooks.  And she enjoys it less than I would.  Not very easy to subject that to a 'feminist analysis'!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if I write this here, rather than put up another mini post, people will see it in the sidebar of recent comments and read it.  Let&#8217;s see. . . .</p>
<p>I thought of an important example that I left out.  Driving.  I&#8217;m dead sure that men drive more than women - when there&#8217;s a chance for either to drive, though I don&#8217;t know the numbers.  But is it work?  Or is sitting in the passenger seat less pleasant - and so more like work?  </p>
<p>If anyone knows the numbers I&#8217;d be interested to hear.  </p>
<p>And I think of cooking like this too.  I&#8217;d rather cook than just eat.  Unfortunately my wife is pretty fastidious and there&#8217;s lots of things I cook that she won&#8217;t eat.  She also fears finding a hair in the food - something that there&#8217;s probably a slightly higher chance of finding if I cook than she cooks.  So she cooks.  And she enjoys it less than I would.  Not very easy to subject that to a &#8216;feminist analysis&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; The (gender) division of procrastination</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-119692</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; The (gender) division of procrastination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-119692</guid>
		<description>[...] this led me to think again about a column I wrote with some trepidation a while back about the household division of labour. Economic studies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this led me to think again about a column I wrote with some trepidation a while back about the household division of labour. Economic studies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; Carrie Giver</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-94032</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; Carrie Giver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-94032</guid>
		<description>[...] run into (I think) this article they asked me if they could send me the comic for review on Troppo. It arrived before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] run into (I think) this article they asked me if they could send me the comic for review on Troppo. It arrived before [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bahnisch</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28522</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bahnisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28522</guid>
		<description>Technically, Rachel, female dominated occupations are defined (by the ABS if I recall correctly) as those which have more than 60% of women. In practice, the % is usually larger. It's known as horizontal gender segregation of the labour market. (As opposed to vertical gender segregation where women are concentrated in lower paid work across the labour market generally). Another take on it is the creation of expectations in childhood and at school as to what women are "suited for" in the workplace - most of these occupations - teaching, nursing, customer service, child care, hospitality - are ones that place a premium on emotional labour. Interestingly, there's also the phenomenon of the "glass elevator" where the few men often rise to the top - ie male primary school principals and male senior librarians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically, Rachel, female dominated occupations are defined (by the ABS if I recall correctly) as those which have more than 60% of women. In practice, the % is usually larger. It&#8217;s known as horizontal gender segregation of the labour market. (As opposed to vertical gender segregation where women are concentrated in lower paid work across the labour market generally). Another take on it is the creation of expectations in childhood and at school as to what women are &#8220;suited for&#8221; in the workplace - most of these occupations - teaching, nursing, customer service, child care, hospitality - are ones that place a premium on emotional labour. Interestingly, there&#8217;s also the phenomenon of the &#8220;glass elevator&#8221; where the few men often rise to the top - ie male primary school principals and male senior librarians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Thomson</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28518</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28518</guid>
		<description>Another interesting point on this is that women are highly concentrated into a number of occupations.  Many studies draw the conclusion that this is because women gravitate towards occupations which have static skill sets so that they can take time off to bear children - this explains the low number of women in professions like IT, where the job is constantly changing.  These occupations tend to be low paying ... and so the opportunity cost for women of engaging in unpaid work in the home is less than for their (on average) higher paid partner.  The answer, then, is maternity leave and a greater focus on keeping women engaged with the workforce while they are bearing children - doing this would make it unneccesary for women (like me) to choose static, low paying professions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting point on this is that women are highly concentrated into a number of occupations.  Many studies draw the conclusion that this is because women gravitate towards occupations which have static skill sets so that they can take time off to bear children - this explains the low number of women in professions like IT, where the job is constantly changing.  These occupations tend to be low paying &#8230; and so the opportunity cost for women of engaging in unpaid work in the home is less than for their (on average) higher paid partner.  The answer, then, is maternity leave and a greater focus on keeping women engaged with the workforce while they are bearing children - doing this would make it unneccesary for women (like me) to choose static, low paying professions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bahnisch</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bahnisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28510</guid>
		<description>Oh, I wasn't having a go, lisa.

There's more discussion of the hard-wired stuff on the parallel thread &lt;a&gt;over at LP&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I wasn&#8217;t having a go, lisa.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more discussion of the hard-wired stuff on the parallel thread <a>over at LP</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28509</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28509</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the illustration in point, Mark.

But to be fair on Nicholas, after he said "Boys and girls start with hard-wired cognitive biases. Habits then form from repeated individual choices." he did say "And no-one would deny that those choices themselves occur within a culture which thinks differently about men and women."

What we are talking about here is the "culture which thinks differently about men and women". And I think what I tried to say was I'd put a lot more emphasis on this culture than the "hard-wired congnitive biases".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the illustration in point, Mark.</p>
<p>But to be fair on Nicholas, after he said &#8220;Boys and girls start with hard-wired cognitive biases. Habits then form from repeated individual choices.&#8221; he did say &#8220;And no-one would deny that those choices themselves occur within a culture which thinks differently about men and women.&#8221;</p>
<p>What we are talking about here is the &#8220;culture which thinks differently about men and women&#8221;. And I think what I tried to say was I&#8217;d put a lot more emphasis on this culture than the &#8220;hard-wired congnitive biases&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bahnisch</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28507</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bahnisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28507</guid>
		<description>On lisa's point, we could imagine a Queer Eye for the Straight Girl. It would be much different to Queer Eye for a Straight Guy. Some of those guys who get makeovers for their flats/houses live in appalling squalor (often in prime Manhattan apartments) but get treated like "just boys". If there were a tv show that showed middle class 20 something women living in filthy apartments with decaying food on the floor, the moral tone would be condemnation and shock rather than indulgence, I'm sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On lisa&#8217;s point, we could imagine a Queer Eye for the Straight Girl. It would be much different to Queer Eye for a Straight Guy. Some of those guys who get makeovers for their flats/houses live in appalling squalor (often in prime Manhattan apartments) but get treated like &#8220;just boys&#8221;. If there were a tv show that showed middle class 20 something women living in filthy apartments with decaying food on the floor, the moral tone would be condemnation and shock rather than indulgence, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28506</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28506</guid>
		<description>Well written and well thought out Nicholas. In the article you draw out and expand on the complexities that actually reflect reality.

One thing I noticed by its absence is the idea that women do more housework because the negative ramifications for them if they don't do at least 50% but typically *over* 50% of the housework. As a woman, I see and hear evidence all around me that female slobs are thought of with much more disdain than male slobs. I'm pretty convinced that this is what would be the difference between my own "decision" to do a certain amount of domestic chores and the "decision" of my male counterparts to do less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written and well thought out Nicholas. In the article you draw out and expand on the complexities that actually reflect reality.</p>
<p>One thing I noticed by its absence is the idea that women do more housework because the negative ramifications for them if they don&#8217;t do at least 50% but typically *over* 50% of the housework. As a woman, I see and hear evidence all around me that female slobs are thought of with much more disdain than male slobs. I&#8217;m pretty convinced that this is what would be the difference between my own &#8220;decision&#8221; to do a certain amount of domestic chores and the &#8220;decision&#8221; of my male counterparts to do less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28505</link>
		<dc:creator>Link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28505</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nicholas good piece.  It is a dilemma that's not set to change much or quickly. Society is still strongly partriachal and its easy as a female to be cynical because of this overt imbalance.  Men like yourself sometimes question the status quo and wonder why, but with female complicty and confusion about feminist ideals and a backlash against it which is enforcing gender roles, its going to be long slow haul to recognise that a woman with a predisposition to germ eradication is actually helping to preserve life and ideally should be valued in this effort and given a helping hand without being abused for seeking some support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nicholas good piece.  It is a dilemma that&#8217;s not set to change much or quickly. Society is still strongly partriachal and its easy as a female to be cynical because of this overt imbalance.  Men like yourself sometimes question the status quo and wonder why, but with female complicty and confusion about feminist ideals and a backlash against it which is enforcing gender roles, its going to be long slow haul to recognise that a woman with a predisposition to germ eradication is actually helping to preserve life and ideally should be valued in this effort and given a helping hand without being abused for seeking some support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28504</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/01/11/gender-division-of-labour-in-the-home-the-column/#comment-28504</guid>
		<description>"Scores of studies reveal women are still doing the lioness's share of the work at home. (Lions never did do much work.)"

Good one! The lion's share of work is something of a misnomer. The female lions in the pride do all the smart lead-up work in hunting as well, the lion just turns up for the end game and the tucker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Scores of studies reveal women are still doing the lioness&#8217;s share of the work at home. (Lions never did do much work.)&#8221;</p>
<p>Good one! The lion&#8217;s share of work is something of a misnomer. The female lions in the pride do all the smart lead-up work in hunting as well, the lion just turns up for the end game and the tucker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
