<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should you be restructuring your telecommunications?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/</link>
	<description>Fearlessly dispensing political, legal and economic analysis (and some whimsy) since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:57:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zlhb</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-111454</link>
		<dc:creator>zlhb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-111454</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Club Troppo &#187; TPG - no longer my VoIP provider of choice - what&#8217;s yours?</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-94876</link>
		<dc:creator>Club Troppo &#187; TPG - no longer my VoIP provider of choice - what&#8217;s yours?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-94876</guid>
		<description>[...] posted a big rave about VoIP a while back. It&#8217;s a great thing. But you may want to consider which service provider you use. If anyone [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted a big rave about VoIP a while back. It&#8217;s a great thing. But you may want to consider which service provider you use. If anyone [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meika</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-44147</link>
		<dc:creator>meika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-44147</guid>
		<description>we&#039;re now looking at IP-PABX, and http://www.asterisk.org/about and some adapters like http://www.ozvoip.com/products.php?id=17</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;re now looking at IP-PABX, and <a href="http://www.asterisk.org/about">http://www.asterisk.org/about</a> and some adapters like <a href="http://www.ozvoip.com/products.php?id=17">http://www.ozvoip.com/products.php?id=17</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43517</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43517</guid>
		<description>meika, &lt;i&gt;the reason we cannot get ADSL is becuase we have a fibre optic cable to a mini-exchange which does not do ADSL, even if we were close enough to the main exchange the fibre optic stuff that up. And the fibre optic goes past no houses at all.&lt;/i&gt;

About four years ago I lived two miles from AOL&#039;s world headquarters. Smack bam in the boom. We could not get broadband in our development for the same reason, and the cable company (comcast IIRC), which had a local monopoly had not bothered to do broadband in our area. Couldn&#039;t believe it. We were in a high tech region and couldnt get broadband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meika, <i>the reason we cannot get ADSL is becuase we have a fibre optic cable to a mini-exchange which does not do ADSL, even if we were close enough to the main exchange the fibre optic stuff that up. And the fibre optic goes past no houses at all.</i></p>
<p>About four years ago I lived two miles from AOL&#8217;s world headquarters. Smack bam in the boom. We could not get broadband in our development for the same reason, and the cable company (comcast IIRC), which had a local monopoly had not bothered to do broadband in our area. Couldn&#8217;t believe it. We were in a high tech region and couldnt get broadband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meika</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43505</link>
		<dc:creator>meika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43505</guid>
		<description>I live here www.cohousingcoop.org

When we built five years ago we put in ethernet cable to all the houses hoping to share broadband. It took all that time to get it up.

We are 6km frm the Hobart GPO and broadband over a line (ADSL or fibre) is still impossible so we went for a Dad and Dave company (run by radio tech and computer nerds in their spare time) www.tasmanet.com.au for a wireless linkprobbably further than from Hall to Black Mountain tower and straight over the top of our GPO.

It works okay except when it rains and when ten household teenagers go online in the evening and do more than chat. But its $100 per month for 12 households and an office and some do VoIP.

the reason we cannot get ADSL is becuase we have a fibre optic cable to a mini-exchange which does not do ADSL, even if we were close enough to the main exchange the fibre optic stuff that up. And the fibre optic goes past no houses at all.

When we moved in it took over a year to get our phones  connected to the mini-exchange down the road as Telstra was in dispute with some supplier and the old equipment could handle 12 new phones (yes that&#039;s right, some 6km from the GPO and they couldn&#039;t cope with new phones, like we were out in woop woop or something)

Some of the inertia comes from the fact that some households just don&#039;t see the point. I mean I&#039;ve got VoIP and set it up with my older ACT in-laws when were there but they just don&#039;t like it. I&#039;ve got no one to ring, so its real cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live here <a href="http://www.cohousingcoop.org">http://www.cohousingcoop.org</a></p>
<p>When we built five years ago we put in ethernet cable to all the houses hoping to share broadband. It took all that time to get it up.</p>
<p>We are 6km frm the Hobart GPO and broadband over a line (ADSL or fibre) is still impossible so we went for a Dad and Dave company (run by radio tech and computer nerds in their spare time) <a href="http://www.tasmanet.com.au">http://www.tasmanet.com.au</a> for a wireless linkprobbably further than from Hall to Black Mountain tower and straight over the top of our GPO.</p>
<p>It works okay except when it rains and when ten household teenagers go online in the evening and do more than chat. But its $100 per month for 12 households and an office and some do VoIP.</p>
<p>the reason we cannot get ADSL is becuase we have a fibre optic cable to a mini-exchange which does not do ADSL, even if we were close enough to the main exchange the fibre optic stuff that up. And the fibre optic goes past no houses at all.</p>
<p>When we moved in it took over a year to get our phones  connected to the mini-exchange down the road as Telstra was in dispute with some supplier and the old equipment could handle 12 new phones (yes that&#8217;s right, some 6km from the GPO and they couldn&#8217;t cope with new phones, like we were out in woop woop or something)</p>
<p>Some of the inertia comes from the fact that some households just don&#8217;t see the point. I mean I&#8217;ve got VoIP and set it up with my older ACT in-laws when were there but they just don&#8217;t like it. I&#8217;ve got no one to ring, so its real cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megami</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43503</link>
		<dc:creator>Megami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43503</guid>
		<description>The problem I have with VOIP is I still have to pay Telstra for the line rental to run broadband. I make hardly any calls at the moment, so I probably pay more for line rental than calls (sad, but true - I have no friends).  I am looking at cable, and bypassing Telstra all together, but I am far from a tech-head so early days yet. But your article had some great info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have with VOIP is I still have to pay Telstra for the line rental to run broadband. I make hardly any calls at the moment, so I probably pay more for line rental than calls (sad, but true &#8211; I have no friends).  I am looking at cable, and bypassing Telstra all together, but I am far from a tech-head so early days yet. But your article had some great info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis X Holden</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43497</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis X Holden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43497</guid>
		<description>nic - I think I remember looking into it a few years ago and finding what David above said - that if you charge - say for wire/or less - sharing with your neighbour you need a carrier licence. Not that that has stopped a few neighbours slinging a cat 5 over the fence between roofs.

My local exchange has ADSL2+ with huge speeds for lower than ordinary 512 adsl charges but, and its a big but, at the moment you have to stop your current ADSL and wait perhaps up to 3 weeks to get connected to adsl2+, so that effectively means no internet or mail for 3 weeks. Seems madness and has a whiff of Telstra nastyness about it if you ask me. Rapid changeover is supposed to be here by xmas - then i&#039;ll be on it as quick as a mozzie on a redhead&#039;s arm at a bbq.

As far as phone calls go I do a lot of Skype overseas for free Skype to Skype. My brother lives in Scotland and works in the oil industry, his USA company uses Skype internationally for business. 

For long distance in Oz a few country cousins have this Telstra deal, where they pay, I think, about $70 fixed a month and get all you can eat phone calls STD etc. So we ring them for 10 seconds or text them on mobile and they ring us.

For other International calls, to say my daughter in Taiwan, the Phone Cards can&#039;t be beaten. We get about 15 hours for $10 through normal phone to phone. Telstra would charge me between $720 and $1089 for that depending on what plan i use. Yes those figures are correct. I think the cards re-route through both VoIp and spot market telco lines, the quailty can vary but is uusually as good as normal phone. If it isn&#039;t you just ring back in a second or so and see how it goes. You can get similar cards for each country or region and also internally in Oz.

All the VoIP deals I have looked at are dearer than the cards and less convienient.

Gizmo Project, a similar free product to Skype, offers the same as Skype PLUS FREE calls to landlines and mobiles of other Gizmo subscribers (limited countries), free registration, - this seems to be a move to unseat Skype dominance. [Don&#039;t ask me about what sort of business plan that is.]

I can just imagine what Sol and the Amigos at Telstra would say if state or local government implemented cheap network systems that included VoIP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nic &#8211; I think I remember looking into it a few years ago and finding what David above said &#8211; that if you charge &#8211; say for wire/or less &#8211; sharing with your neighbour you need a carrier licence. Not that that has stopped a few neighbours slinging a cat 5 over the fence between roofs.</p>
<p>My local exchange has ADSL2+ with huge speeds for lower than ordinary 512 adsl charges but, and its a big but, at the moment you have to stop your current ADSL and wait perhaps up to 3 weeks to get connected to adsl2+, so that effectively means no internet or mail for 3 weeks. Seems madness and has a whiff of Telstra nastyness about it if you ask me. Rapid changeover is supposed to be here by xmas &#8211; then i&#8217;ll be on it as quick as a mozzie on a redhead&#8217;s arm at a bbq.</p>
<p>As far as phone calls go I do a lot of Skype overseas for free Skype to Skype. My brother lives in Scotland and works in the oil industry, his USA company uses Skype internationally for business. </p>
<p>For long distance in Oz a few country cousins have this Telstra deal, where they pay, I think, about $70 fixed a month and get all you can eat phone calls STD etc. So we ring them for 10 seconds or text them on mobile and they ring us.</p>
<p>For other International calls, to say my daughter in Taiwan, the Phone Cards can&#8217;t be beaten. We get about 15 hours for $10 through normal phone to phone. Telstra would charge me between $720 and $1089 for that depending on what plan i use. Yes those figures are correct. I think the cards re-route through both VoIp and spot market telco lines, the quailty can vary but is uusually as good as normal phone. If it isn&#8217;t you just ring back in a second or so and see how it goes. You can get similar cards for each country or region and also internally in Oz.</p>
<p>All the VoIP deals I have looked at are dearer than the cards and less convienient.</p>
<p>Gizmo Project, a similar free product to Skype, offers the same as Skype PLUS FREE calls to landlines and mobiles of other Gizmo subscribers (limited countries), free registration, &#8211; this seems to be a move to unseat Skype dominance. [Don't ask me about what sort of business plan that is.]</p>
<p>I can just imagine what Sol and the Amigos at Telstra would say if state or local government implemented cheap network systems that included VoIP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43493</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43493</guid>
		<description>It would definitely be cool for a local neighbourhood to buy its bandwidth in bulk, but I think you would need to have a group of people who were interested in the experimental nature of it, and who were prepared to put up with the frustrations which would inevitably arise from time to time.  I could imagine lots of people being keen until the first time they picked up the phone and couldn&#039;t get a clear call through, at which point they&#039;d rapidly lose interest and go back to the old way.

Also, if everyone was doing it, especially using newer, faster, more spectrum-hungry wi-fi technologies, all the networks would be treading over each other and creating havoc for everyone.  &#039;Course, Cat5 cable is very cheap and abundant ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would definitely be cool for a local neighbourhood to buy its bandwidth in bulk, but I think you would need to have a group of people who were interested in the experimental nature of it, and who were prepared to put up with the frustrations which would inevitably arise from time to time.  I could imagine lots of people being keen until the first time they picked up the phone and couldn&#8217;t get a clear call through, at which point they&#8217;d rapidly lose interest and go back to the old way.</p>
<p>Also, if everyone was doing it, especially using newer, faster, more spectrum-hungry wi-fi technologies, all the networks would be treading over each other and creating havoc for everyone.  &#8216;Course, Cat5 cable is very cheap and abundant &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43492</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43492</guid>
		<description>Nick,  Great article. Reminds me of a similar analysis that I need to do on my own phone services. However your suggestion about using your WiFi to help hookup the neighbours is great as long as you keep it to the theory. The practice is the same as throwing a cable over the fence to share a phone line or network connection. The ACA comes along and demands that you have a carrier licence and become a public telco/isp. These regulations date back to the good old monopoly days before Telstra et al. Another wonderful example of how technology is making a mockery of regulation and control by the government.

Regards david</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,  Great article. Reminds me of a similar analysis that I need to do on my own phone services. However your suggestion about using your WiFi to help hookup the neighbours is great as long as you keep it to the theory. The practice is the same as throwing a cable over the fence to share a phone line or network connection. The ACA comes along and demands that you have a carrier licence and become a public telco/isp. These regulations date back to the good old monopoly days before Telstra et al. Another wonderful example of how technology is making a mockery of regulation and control by the government.</p>
<p>Regards david</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43487</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43487</guid>
		<description>Most of the ISPs price their plans based on their customers never using their full quota. For example, on the lowest volume ADSL2 plan from my ISP I get 20Gb/month a month, but would rarely use over 8Gb/month. Unless you&#039;re pulling videos and music its pretty hard to download that much.

btw some of the newer mobile phones around these days are voip capable. They have wifi built-in. So wherever you are you can look for an open access point first and use that instead of paying mobile rates.

Another interesting thing to try (though can be tricky to setup) is to use Asterisk on a computer as a PBX for your home. That way all of the incoming and outgoing voip and PSTN calls can be handled in one place (eg person specific mail boxes, automatic calculation of least cost routing, filtering of calls based on caller and time of day, telemarketer filtering - put them in voice menu hell!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the ISPs price their plans based on their customers never using their full quota. For example, on the lowest volume ADSL2 plan from my ISP I get 20Gb/month a month, but would rarely use over 8Gb/month. Unless you&#8217;re pulling videos and music its pretty hard to download that much.</p>
<p>btw some of the newer mobile phones around these days are voip capable. They have wifi built-in. So wherever you are you can look for an open access point first and use that instead of paying mobile rates.</p>
<p>Another interesting thing to try (though can be tricky to setup) is to use Asterisk on a computer as a PBX for your home. That way all of the incoming and outgoing voip and PSTN calls can be handled in one place (eg person specific mail boxes, automatic calculation of least cost routing, filtering of calls based on caller and time of day, telemarketer filtering &#8211; put them in voice menu hell!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendo</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43485</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43485</guid>
		<description>Nice work indeed. My needs are not as complex, but that didn&#039;t stop my comm bills weighing way too high every month. After five, forty minuter calls to Telstra bill-problem numbers (i.e. one each month) and having been a Telstra client for some forty years, enough was enough.

I changed my landline to Telstra pre-paid...about $14/month. That handles all my incoming calls, and I retain my original number. I can still make calls, but in general I only use this line to call my local international jump number to use my prepaid international card. That means I only get charged for one local untimed call.
I changed my mobile to Vodaphone (you can use Optus too) prepay, and found that I could make all the calls I needed to for $49/month. I don&#039;t call international as the mobile is still a timed call. You can drag your Telstra number across to the new provider.
So I&#039;m saving over $1500 per year.

One warning about VOIP. Typical Voip uses about 2.5 megs of data every 10 minutes, according to my ISP. If you are on an unlimited plan, you might say it is &quot;free&quot;, but if you do have a limit, be aware that you are chewing into your account when on VOIP, and that is not &quot;free&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work indeed. My needs are not as complex, but that didn&#8217;t stop my comm bills weighing way too high every month. After five, forty minuter calls to Telstra bill-problem numbers (i.e. one each month) and having been a Telstra client for some forty years, enough was enough.</p>
<p>I changed my landline to Telstra pre-paid&#8230;about $14/month. That handles all my incoming calls, and I retain my original number. I can still make calls, but in general I only use this line to call my local international jump number to use my prepaid international card. That means I only get charged for one local untimed call.<br />
I changed my mobile to Vodaphone (you can use Optus too) prepay, and found that I could make all the calls I needed to for $49/month. I don&#8217;t call international as the mobile is still a timed call. You can drag your Telstra number across to the new provider.<br />
So I&#8217;m saving over $1500 per year.</p>
<p>One warning about VOIP. Typical Voip uses about 2.5 megs of data every 10 minutes, according to my ISP. If you are on an unlimited plan, you might say it is &#8220;free&#8221;, but if you do have a limit, be aware that you are chewing into your account when on VOIP, and that is not &#8220;free&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Yaseen</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43482</link>
		<dc:creator>David Yaseen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43482</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting idea, and one that could work quite well. The only problem would be if there were periodic disruptions in your dsl service. If it&#039;s pretty steady, you might give it a go.

If you&#039;re serious, give &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20040527.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; a read. There&#039;s a bit of lifting involved, but it should work fine. 

One thing, though: take all of your bandwidth and at least triple them. It would take one, or at the most two, teenage girls to put you right over the limit. :)

Good luck,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting idea, and one that could work quite well. The only problem would be if there were periodic disruptions in your dsl service. If it&#8217;s pretty steady, you might give it a go.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re serious, give <a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20040527.html">this</a> a read. There&#8217;s a bit of lifting involved, but it should work fine. </p>
<p>One thing, though: take all of your bandwidth and at least triple them. It would take one, or at the most two, teenage girls to put you right over the limit. :)</p>
<p>Good luck,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43449</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43449</guid>
		<description>Nicholas, I think it is because they sell over-capacity to residential users and would prefer you got a business plan if you are going to resell. Cable companies are the worst for this practice (and filtering ports), the small independent ISPs usually dont care. The ISP I am with recently got bought out by a bigger company, but was a small two town ISP when I joined. 

I also host ssr on my wifi network amongst other things. I dont have any data restrictions - I suspect I would be getting cut off if I tried that with Telstra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas, I think it is because they sell over-capacity to residential users and would prefer you got a business plan if you are going to resell. Cable companies are the worst for this practice (and filtering ports), the small independent ISPs usually dont care. The ISP I am with recently got bought out by a bigger company, but was a small two town ISP when I joined. </p>
<p>I also host ssr on my wifi network amongst other things. I dont have any data restrictions &#8211; I suspect I would be getting cut off if I tried that with Telstra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Bounds</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43443</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bounds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43443</guid>
		<description>Nicholas,

There are a vast number of different and incompatible wireless standards that operate in different parts of the radio spectrum and offer different characteristics such as short range/high bandwidth, long range, penetrates through solid walls, etc etc.

This is one of the barriers to adoption because there isn&#039;t a commonly accepted standard for the whole community to use.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.budde.com.au/Reports/Contents/Australia-WiFi-Hot-Spot-Market-Overview-and-Analyses-2574.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sheer number of competing standards&lt;/a&gt; is quite daunting.

The current GSM and CMDA mobile phone networks aren&#039;t suitable because their maximum bandwidth is far too low.  Typical data rates are 35kbps for GSM and 120kbps for GPRS.

Even 3G data speeds are nothing special -- maxing out at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telstra.com/countrywide/telstramobility/default.asp?sn=11&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;250kbps for 3G GSM and 700kbps for the next-gen CDMA EV-DO standard in optimum conditions&lt;/a&gt;.

Of course, even if these speeds were fantastically fast, the community &quot;mesh&quot; networks aren&#039;t possible using CDMA, GSM or the wireless broadband technologies used by Unwired or iBurst because they are all licensed parts of the spectrum -- in other words, you have to pay the provider to access &quot;their&quot; frequency.

802.11/WiFi doesn&#039;t have the same problem with access because these devices operate in an unlicensed part of the spectrum, but the range on these devices is fairly limited and reception will be patchy depending on the solid objects or walls placed between the transmitter and receiver.  Additionally, as the number of devices in this portion of the spectrum grow, they will start to interfere with each other and potentially degrade performance.  Nonetheless, there are a variety of &lt;a href=&quot;http://wireless.org.au/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;community wireless projects&lt;/a&gt; out there attempting to build this infrastructure.

What would be interesting is if the Government made a portion of the radio spectrum free for anyone to use on the condition that you &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; accept and re-transmit messages from anyone else sending on that frequency without charge.  Don&#039;t know how you could make that work in a legislative sense, but it&#039;s an intriguing idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas,</p>
<p>There are a vast number of different and incompatible wireless standards that operate in different parts of the radio spectrum and offer different characteristics such as short range/high bandwidth, long range, penetrates through solid walls, etc etc.</p>
<p>This is one of the barriers to adoption because there isn&#8217;t a commonly accepted standard for the whole community to use.  The <a href="http://www.budde.com.au/Reports/Contents/Australia-WiFi-Hot-Spot-Market-Overview-and-Analyses-2574.html">sheer number of competing standards</a> is quite daunting.</p>
<p>The current GSM and CMDA mobile phone networks aren&#8217;t suitable because their maximum bandwidth is far too low.  Typical data rates are 35kbps for GSM and 120kbps for GPRS.</p>
<p>Even 3G data speeds are nothing special &#8212; maxing out at <a href="http://www.telstra.com/countrywide/telstramobility/default.asp?sn=11">250kbps for 3G GSM and 700kbps for the next-gen CDMA EV-DO standard in optimum conditions</a>.</p>
<p>Of course, even if these speeds were fantastically fast, the community &#8220;mesh&#8221; networks aren&#8217;t possible using CDMA, GSM or the wireless broadband technologies used by Unwired or iBurst because they are all licensed parts of the spectrum &#8212; in other words, you have to pay the provider to access &#8220;their&#8221; frequency.</p>
<p>802.11/WiFi doesn&#8217;t have the same problem with access because these devices operate in an unlicensed part of the spectrum, but the range on these devices is fairly limited and reception will be patchy depending on the solid objects or walls placed between the transmitter and receiver.  Additionally, as the number of devices in this portion of the spectrum grow, they will start to interfere with each other and potentially degrade performance.  Nonetheless, there are a variety of <a href="http://wireless.org.au/">community wireless projects</a> out there attempting to build this infrastructure.</p>
<p>What would be interesting is if the Government made a portion of the radio spectrum free for anyone to use on the condition that you <em>must</em> accept and re-transmit messages from anyone else sending on that frequency without charge.  Don&#8217;t know how you could make that work in a legislative sense, but it&#8217;s an intriguing idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Gruen</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43442</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Gruen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43442</guid>
		<description>Yes, I should have &#039;foregrounded&#039; the restrictions on current services to set up networks more fully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I should have &#8216;foregrounded&#8217; the restrictions on current services to set up networks more fully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43438</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/08/25/should-you-be-restructuring-your-telecommunications/#comment-43438</guid>
		<description>Reselling local area wifi is prohibited in most of the service agreements in the US. My provider doesnt, but I bought a plan which would let me host other services (using external ports) on a server on my network.

One of the advantages of having others jump on your local Wifi network is narrowcasting possibilities. You can run a radio station through your private network, ARIA need never know, and since it is your private network, Telstra cant hit you for moving data. With some judicious routing you could have other local wifi networks connect to yours too and expand the narrowcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reselling local area wifi is prohibited in most of the service agreements in the US. My provider doesnt, but I bought a plan which would let me host other services (using external ports) on a server on my network.</p>
<p>One of the advantages of having others jump on your local Wifi network is narrowcasting possibilities. You can run a radio station through your private network, ARIA need never know, and since it is your private network, Telstra cant hit you for moving data. With some judicious routing you could have other local wifi networks connect to yours too and expand the narrowcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

