<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruddy Readies to Blast Bomber to the Back Bench.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/12/01/ruddy-readies-to-blast-bomber-to-the-back-bench/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/12/01/ruddy-readies-to-blast-bomber-to-the-back-bench/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:04:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wigan</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2006/12/01/ruddy-readies-to-blast-bomber-to-the-back-bench/#comment-66707</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubtroppo.com.au/2006/12/01/ruddy-readies-to-blast-bomber-to-the-back-bench/#comment-66707</guid>
		<description>A story I heard was that when anointed this second time, Beazley was given 18 months to make an impact.  That hasn&#039;t really happened. despite a respectable 2PPV showing in most polls over the past year. Looked at another way. a majority want to dump Howard, but for around or above 60% of voters, Beazer is not the first choice.

It was an odd decision to look backwards to Beazley in the first place, but a lot were probably still in shock after the Latham implosion.

I&#039;m with you, Rex. I reckon this pair can do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story I heard was that when anointed this second time, Beazley was given 18 months to make an impact.  That hasn&#8217;t really happened. despite a respectable 2PPV showing in most polls over the past year. Looked at another way. a majority want to dump Howard, but for around or above 60% of voters, Beazer is not the first choice.</p>
<p>It was an odd decision to look backwards to Beazley in the first place, but a lot were probably still in shock after the Latham implosion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you, Rex. I reckon this pair can do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

