<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The interactive society: an &#8216;open source&#8217; suggestion box for government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/04/28/the-interactive-society-an-%e2%80%98open-source%e2%80%99-suggestion-box-for-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/04/28/the-interactive-society-an-%e2%80%98open-source%e2%80%99-suggestion-box-for-government/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Gruen</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/04/28/the-interactive-society-an-%e2%80%98open-source%e2%80%99-suggestion-box-for-government/#comment-118630</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Gruen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 11:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/04/28/the-interactive-society-an-%e2%80%98open-source%e2%80%99-suggestion-box-for-government/#comment-118630</guid>
		<description>Well, judging by the comments, that created a storm of interest didn&#039;t it.  Still I&#039;m pressing on.  I saw this sensible suggestion from Joshua Gans &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economics.com.au/?p=821&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  So I&#039;m logging it here till further notice.  Anyone with any further sensible suggestions, just bring them on down and record them here. 

Jushua&#039;s suggestion?

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Do Not Call register is up and (sort of) running. . . .  This is clearly a good thing relative to the status quo but it would be remiss of me not to point out that it likely goes too far. Marketers value calling you and so would be willing to pay for that access. For this reason Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff have suggested that it would be better if households could set their price. Rather than block all calls, a marketer calling would have to pay for that access. They could pay a fee for the call itself and then a per minute charge. Consumers who really never wanted calls could set the fee at infinity or change it depending on time of day. This type of thing might actually help the marketers because it could sort out receivers that were more receptive.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not a world beating improvement, but better than a poke in the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, judging by the comments, that created a storm of interest didn&#8217;t it.  Still I&#8217;m pressing on.  I saw this sensible suggestion from Joshua Gans <a href="http://www.economics.com.au/?p=821">here</a>.  So I&#8217;m logging it here till further notice.  Anyone with any further sensible suggestions, just bring them on down and record them here. </p>
<p>Jushua&#8217;s suggestion?</p>
<blockquote><p>The Do Not Call register is up and (sort of) running. . . .  This is clearly a good thing relative to the status quo but it would be remiss of me not to point out that it likely goes too far. Marketers value calling you and so would be willing to pay for that access. For this reason Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff have suggested that it would be better if households could set their price. Rather than block all calls, a marketer calling would have to pay for that access. They could pay a fee for the call itself and then a per minute charge. Consumers who really never wanted calls could set the fee at infinity or change it depending on time of day. This type of thing might actually help the marketers because it could sort out receivers that were more receptive.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not a world beating improvement, but better than a poke in the eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

