<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday&#8217;s Missing Link on Friday!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rank and Vile &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogging and all that</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-148791</link>
		<dc:creator>Rank and Vile &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Blogging and all that</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-148791</guid>
		<description>[...] of course I&#8217;d be lying that I am not somewhat chuffed when blogs which have a high readership mention my posts, but I will continue to blog assuming that no one out there is really [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of course I&#8217;d be lying that I am not somewhat chuffed when blogs which have a high readership mention my posts, but I will continue to blog assuming that no one out there is really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pommygranate</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-133316</link>
		<dc:creator>pommygranate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 11:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-133316</guid>
		<description>Ken

Why dodgy-sounding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken</p>
<p>Why dodgy-sounding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farrell</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-131332</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 23:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-131332</guid>
		<description>Thanks for fixing that, Ken. I expected someone would cover the other 1Q answers, but it seems not. Still, they ones I listed themselves have all the links. A good initiative by TD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for fixing that, Ken. I expected someone would cover the other 1Q answers, but it seems not. Still, they ones I listed themselves have all the links. A good initiative by TD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cs</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-130791</link>
		<dc:creator>cs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-130791</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Andrew Leigh asks an obvious question about the latter:

So the thing that I still cant work out with the ACTUs current campaign against the Howard Government is: what do the 33% of unionists who voted for John Howard in 2004 think about it? Its true that organisations sometimes make decisions that arent supported by all of their members, but one-third really is quite a lot.&lt;/i&gt;

This seems to beg a pretty obvious answer to me. The 33% probably think, at a wild guess, that 67%, or a two-thirds majority, of their colleagues disagree with them. That&#039;s democracy. Who ever thought that what the underwhelming minority thought was the obvious question? How many voted against the Howard government, again? When am I to be interviewed by Andrew Leigh, under the heading of the &quot;obvious question&quot;.

Meanwhile, I&#039;m wondering, unobviously, what the 67% think of the 33% of their colleagues who voted for John Howard. We have to do all the hard yakka, while you bludgers vote however you bloody like, undermining us from the political level. What&#039;s your problem? Tell ya, solidarity has its disappointments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Andrew Leigh asks an obvious question about the latter:</p>
<p>So the thing that I still cant work out with the ACTUs current campaign against the Howard Government is: what do the 33% of unionists who voted for John Howard in 2004 think about it? Its true that organisations sometimes make decisions that arent supported by all of their members, but one-third really is quite a lot.</i></p>
<p>This seems to beg a pretty obvious answer to me. The 33% probably think, at a wild guess, that 67%, or a two-thirds majority, of their colleagues disagree with them. That&#8217;s democracy. Who ever thought that what the underwhelming minority thought was the obvious question? How many voted against the Howard government, again? When am I to be interviewed by Andrew Leigh, under the heading of the &#8220;obvious question&#8221;.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I&#8217;m wondering, unobviously, what the 67% think of the 33% of their colleagues who voted for John Howard. We have to do all the hard yakka, while you bludgers vote however you bloody like, undermining us from the political level. What&#8217;s your problem? Tell ya, solidarity has its disappointments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cam</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-130542</link>
		<dc:creator>cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-130542</guid>
		<description>Could do with a NSFW tag in the title or intro so people at work can make an informed decision whether to view it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could do with a NSFW tag in the title or intro so people at work can make an informed decision whether to view it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farell</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-130365</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/2007/06/15/fridays-missing-link-on-friday/#comment-130365</guid>
		<description>Whoops! Where are my contributions? I&#039;ll email you, Ken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops! Where are my contributions? I&#8217;ll email you, Ken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
