Stupidest sentence of punditry in the campaign. You propose, you decide . . .

Yes Troppodillians, a new Troppo competition – hopefully you’ll just keep coming back till 24th November when you will have weightier concerns on your mind.

Please record in comments, the stupidist bit of punditry you’ve seen in the campaign so far. I confess I’m convening this competition on the spur of the moment, and my choice was instant. There may be stupider things said. I may even have read them. And the author of this one may have said some worthwhile things – though the particular article from which this comes has been fairly comprehensively firewalled from any such risk.

And the first entry is . . . .

Below the fold.

“But can he [Rudd] win?

Well, that depends. If the swing is on, its on, and it will be an unstoppable force.”

Well there you have it. If the swing is on, it’s on. Seems obvious once it’s pointed out.

16 thoughts on “Stupidest sentence of punditry in the campaign. You propose, you decide . . .

  1. My favourite is from Gerard McManus, as quoted yesterday in Poll Bludger:
    “this could still mean that WA, which is three hours behind the east, may determine the final outcome very late on Saturday night”. Full post at: Nial biting poll tipped
    He obviously hasn’t heard that WA has daylight saving, hence a 2 hour gap. With the time correction, I’ve have suggested this possibility on occasion. See psepholgy in blog:
    Labor View from Broome

  2. Before everyone piles onto Caroline Overington, it’s worth remembering that her pursuit of the AWB scandal was some of the better news journalism this country has seen in recent years. She earnt respect with that work. I make no comment on her coverage of Wentworth.

  3. Tony Abbott: “Sleepwalking into a change of government”.

    I think he meant to say he was sleepwalking as part of the government, given how much effort he put into the health portfolio this year :)

  4. I endorse what DWG says. I really bear no animus towards the victim of my post. These people are expected to churn out vast quantities of punditry – and it’s hardly surprising that it’s quality is so low. Still, it was a special sentence.

  5. Brad Norington of the Australian just had a dig at it on Sky news, commenting on a possible change of government:

    ‘There is no such thing as change-less change’

    Very profound.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.