It’s your blog and your call. And yes I read your comment above.
But it certainly doesn’t reflect well on you.

From Princess Brigette’s rottweiler – and boy does she bark some ROT – KKKomrade KKKimmmeeeee. Look at her, look at her, look at her!

Well, its not just about the privacy, Prof! Its also about the individualisation and the consequential failure to see any basis for reflexivity and solidarity.

http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/05/16/class-and-big-brother-2008/#comment-467810

I thought you were taught literacy using Brendan approved phonics methods!

Anyways, I’ll leave you to your Bourdieu and Coke…

Im gonna piss me pants, so will pick up some KFC and a few dozen UDLs on the way back. Press the pause button.

Oh dear, JG. I’m unsure as to what your “dominative (sic) narrative” is. You really are tying yourself in knots, aren’t you? You don’t like luvvies who like Big Brother? But then how can they be luvvies? Not sure how that squares with your pseudo-Bukowski louche on the streets at 3am posture (do you ever trip over Brendan while he’s sitting in the gutter…) or your “I’m the old Labor working man” schtick – I’d have thought to be consistent you should be championing BB.

But who knows? Best get stuck into another six pack of alcopops, dearie. I’ll enjoy my nice bottle of NZ white which I understand is now the same price.

I dont think its particularly productive to take potshots at Jason for citing an academic paper and Bourdieu. It might almost be read as anti-intellectualism… is to establish a distinction between themselves and those others. Thats particularly obvious when its done so blatantly as in Kens case.

Obvious! Particularly so.

http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/05/16/class-and-big-brother-2008/#comment-467592

Ken, Luvvie, I would expect more context sprinkled over your nuance. Would you like your Latte with or without a dominative narrative?

Laugh? I could cry. I’m gonna piss me pants, so will pick up some KFC and a few dozen UDLs on the way back. Press the “pause” button. Pig’s arrrsse.

Just sayin.

TLTB.

Kens [Parish] comments lack some nuance, to put it mildly.

And perhaps some “context” of the subtext, subversive narrative reifying…. I’m sure we get the picure, Luvvie.

Hi Kim. Ive really enjoyed the LP posts on Big Brother. I promise Im not troll-baiting when I say that a lot of what you folks have been saying is consistent with, and maybe extends with some new observations, a really interesting strand of media and cultural studies work on reality TV.

Quite.

http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/05/16/class-and-big-brother-2008/#comment-467525

http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/05/16/class-and-big-brother-2008/#comment-467521

I thank you for said correction, and do hope you and Miss Hathaway shall join Mrs. Jill Hardcore, Mrs. Rosemary Schriver, and Mrs. Liz Brewer is sorting out our up-chucking mingers and petit/e skanks.

Bored now.

What on earth do I have to do with Brendan Nelson?

Hehe.

I didn’t say I hate BB, Laura did. And yes you are a Luvvie, a Big One at that. But your position on BB changes hourly – like your position on ALL issues – depending on which way the Luvvie winds are blowing. You have become so incoherent, a less kind interlocutor might refer to you as Sybil. Less kind to Shirley, that is.

I hope this helps.

Oh this should be a scream. OK big boys, please do give us your wisdom on the history of homosexuality and the current state of Oxford Street in Sydney gay culture. But ARBUP, I think you would do well to stick to designing a ‘Vomitting Rights Trading Scheme’ or some such and leave the pillow-biting, carpet-munching, and pop culture to the grown-ups.