<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pensions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/06/pensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/06/pensions/</link>
	<description>Fearlessly dispensing political, legal and economic analysis (and some whimsy) since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:44:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: conrad</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/06/pensions/#comment-322348</link>
		<dc:creator>conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6004#comment-322348</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be willing to trade-off higher pensions with much stronger asset tests -- I don&#039;t see why things like family homes arn&#039;t included when it&#039;s easy to get negative equity loans and so on now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be willing to trade-off higher pensions with much stronger asset tests &#8212; I don&#8217;t see why things like family homes arn&#8217;t included when it&#8217;s easy to get negative equity loans and so on now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

