<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cometh the hour: Paul Krugman&#8217;s Nobel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/</link>
	<description>Fearlessly dispensing political, legal and economic analysis (and some whimsy) since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:44:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Gruen</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/#comment-465574</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Gruen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6104#comment-465574</guid>
		<description>Re-reading this, I recall writing it that I was thinking that the third point should have encompassed more than financial crisis, because I remember reading a great article of Krugman&#039;s on whether the Euro was a good idea - in which he pointed out what is now obvious - that Europe isn&#039;t a natural currency union. Point three should have been more general - and referenced his writing in international macro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-reading this, I recall writing it that I was thinking that the third point should have encompassed more than financial crisis, because I remember reading a great article of Krugman&#8217;s on whether the Euro was a good idea &#8211; in which he pointed out what is now obvious &#8211; that Europe isn&#8217;t a natural currency union. Point three should have been more general &#8211; and referenced his writing in international macro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real journalism - sw'as</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/#comment-357919</link>
		<dc:creator>Real journalism - sw'as</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6104#comment-357919</guid>
		<description>[...] pages.)) or focusing on the spin - not the story.Then I clicked over to Club Troppo to read about Paul Krugman&#039;s Nobel Prize. It seems as though real journalism does still exist. I&#039;m very happy that people like Krugman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pages.)) or focusing on the spin &#8211; not the story.Then I clicked over to Club Troppo to read about Paul Krugman&#8217;s Nobel Prize. It seems as though real journalism does still exist. I&#8217;m very happy that people like Krugman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real journalism at sw&#8217;as</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/#comment-324057</link>
		<dc:creator>Real journalism at sw&#8217;as</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6104#comment-324057</guid>
		<description>[...] I clicked over to Club Troppo to read about Paul Krugman&#8217;s Nobel Prize. It seems as though real journalism does still exist. I&#8217;m very happy that people like Krugman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I clicked over to Club Troppo to read about Paul Krugman&#8217;s Nobel Prize. It seems as though real journalism does still exist. I&#8217;m very happy that people like Krugman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJ</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/#comment-324054</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6104#comment-324054</guid>
		<description>A well deserved honour. The wingnuts didn&#039;t seem very pleased, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A well deserved honour. The wingnuts didn&#8217;t seem very pleased, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Gruen</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/#comment-324052</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Gruen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6104#comment-324052</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree with both your major points James. Indeed most of them occurred to me and got to the stage of vague intentions as I wrote the piece, but given the limitations on space and time, didn&#039;t find their way into the piece.  Had I had the chance to run it past you - as I often do with the AFR columns, I might have done a better job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree with both your major points James. Indeed most of them occurred to me and got to the stage of vague intentions as I wrote the piece, but given the limitations on space and time, didn&#8217;t find their way into the piece.  Had I had the chance to run it past you &#8211; as I often do with the AFR columns, I might have done a better job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Farrell</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/10/14/cometh-the-hour-paul-krugmans-nobel/#comment-324015</link>
		<dc:creator>James Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6104#comment-324015</guid>
		<description>Great work, Nicholas. Under Point 4, you could perhaps have been a bit more specific about the nature of PK&#039;s popular interventions. I refer in particular to his critique of &#039;policy entrepreneurs&#039;. That fact that just as many of his targets were people like Lester Thurow from the putative left as from the right, laid the foundation for his reputation as an even-handed critic who rests his case on basic economic logic and facts. Having made that investment, he has reaped huge dividends as a critic of the Bush Administrative without having tp resort to phoney even-handedness (his bugbear and yours) in order to retain credibilty.

In terms of their contribution to popular writing, I&#039;m not sure that a comparison with Keynes is feasible. Krugman has the benefit of vastly more time and resources for that stuff, as well as a much more codified body of theory to draw upon. On the other hand, Keynes was a dazzling stylist, which Krugman, though a clear expositor and occasionally an entertaining polemicist, is not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work, Nicholas. Under Point 4, you could perhaps have been a bit more specific about the nature of PK&#8217;s popular interventions. I refer in particular to his critique of &#8216;policy entrepreneurs&#8217;. That fact that just as many of his targets were people like Lester Thurow from the putative left as from the right, laid the foundation for his reputation as an even-handed critic who rests his case on basic economic logic and facts. Having made that investment, he has reaped huge dividends as a critic of the Bush Administrative without having tp resort to phoney even-handedness (his bugbear and yours) in order to retain credibilty.</p>
<p>In terms of their contribution to popular writing, I&#8217;m not sure that a comparison with Keynes is feasible. Krugman has the benefit of vastly more time and resources for that stuff, as well as a much more codified body of theory to draw upon. On the other hand, Keynes was a dazzling stylist, which Krugman, though a clear expositor and occasionally an entertaining polemicist, is not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

