<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Nindows 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/12/12/microsoft-nindows-200/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/12/12/microsoft-nindows-200/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Down and Out of Saigon</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/12/12/microsoft-nindows-200/#comment-335668</link>
		<dc:creator>Down and Out of Saigon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6717#comment-335668</guid>
		<description>Jacques, if one is being charitable about Edwards, I can see him being fine with standard tech blogging (like one finds on MSDN), but finds political blogging a waste. If one is uncharitable, Edwards is just clueless about blogging altogether. Personally, I&#039;m inclined to be uncharitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques, if one is being charitable about Edwards, I can see him being fine with standard tech blogging (like one finds on MSDN), but finds political blogging a waste. If one is uncharitable, Edwards is just clueless about blogging altogether. Personally, I&#8217;m inclined to be uncharitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djackmanson</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2008/12/12/microsoft-nindows-200/#comment-335663</link>
		<dc:creator>djackmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=6717#comment-335663</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;such blogs had tended to be not much more than cliques of common interest that reaffirmed partisan positions and denigrated alternative points of view.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While this is not universally true, surely everyone can think of a large number of political blogs where this IS true? For every &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepipingshrike.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Piping Shrike&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pollytics&lt;/a&gt; there are plenty of sites where smug, mindless groupthink in the comments dominates the culture.

As long as the crap remains publically prominent, it will be easy for people to maintain misconceptions like Mr Edwards&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>such blogs had tended to be not much more than cliques of common interest that reaffirmed partisan positions and denigrated alternative points of view.</p></blockquote>
<p>While this is not universally true, surely everyone can think of a large number of political blogs where this IS true? For every <a href="http://thepipingshrike.blogspot.com/">Piping Shrike</a> or <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/">Pollytics</a> there are plenty of sites where smug, mindless groupthink in the comments dominates the culture.</p>
<p>As long as the crap remains publically prominent, it will be easy for people to maintain misconceptions like Mr Edwards&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

