<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pedantic fact checking &#8212; Did Nixon really say &#8220;we are all Keynesians now&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/02/15/pedantic-fact-checking-did-nixon-really-say-we-are-keynesians-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/02/15/pedantic-fact-checking-did-nixon-really-say-we-are-keynesians-now/</link>
	<description>Fearlessly dispensing political, legal and economic analysis (and some whimsy) since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafe Champion</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/02/15/pedantic-fact-checking-did-nixon-really-say-we-are-keynesians-now/#comment-346250</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=7249#comment-346250</guid>
		<description>Interesting call Don! And a great rejoinder from TimT!!

It is interesting to note some of the divisions in the ranks of classical liberals, for instance many are scathing about the &quot;positivism&quot; or &quot;scientism&quot; of Friedman&#039;s methodology and they think that the defects of his methodology could be more damaging in the long run than the benefit of his defence of liberal (free trade) policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting call Don! And a great rejoinder from TimT!!</p>
<p>It is interesting to note some of the divisions in the ranks of classical liberals, for instance many are scathing about the &#8220;positivism&#8221; or &#8220;scientism&#8221; of Friedman&#8217;s methodology and they think that the defects of his methodology could be more damaging in the long run than the benefit of his defence of liberal (free trade) policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimT</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/02/15/pedantic-fact-checking-did-nixon-really-say-we-are-keynesians-now/#comment-346215</link>
		<dc:creator>TimT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=7249#comment-346215</guid>
		<description>Historical journalistic fisking! I love it. And I can just bet that, not only did the reporter misquote Milton Friedman, but deliberately asked the questions in such a way as to get a predictable response from Friedman. Straight out of the time-honoured tabloid journalists box o&#039; tricks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historical journalistic fisking! I love it. And I can just bet that, not only did the reporter misquote Milton Friedman, but deliberately asked the questions in such a way as to get a predictable response from Friedman. Straight out of the time-honoured tabloid journalists box o&#8217; tricks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STT</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/02/15/pedantic-fact-checking-did-nixon-really-say-we-are-keynesians-now/#comment-346191</link>
		<dc:creator>STT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=7249#comment-346191</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that, Don. Just the type of thing to get me through a Monday morning. Now if only people knew the true origin of the term &#039;the dismal science&#039;, perhaps they wouldn&#039;t be so disdainful of eonomists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, Don. Just the type of thing to get me through a Monday morning. Now if only people knew the true origin of the term &#8216;the dismal science&#8217;, perhaps they wouldn&#8217;t be so disdainful of eonomists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

