<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the hyper-rationality of economics isn&#8217;t so good as a management education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/06/18/why-the-hyper-rationality-of-economics-isnt-so-good-as-a-management-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/06/18/why-the-hyper-rationality-of-economics-isnt-so-good-as-a-management-education/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:49:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/06/18/why-the-hyper-rationality-of-economics-isnt-so-good-as-a-management-education/#comment-358538</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=8715#comment-358538</guid>
		<description>Oh dear,
These researchers conflate MBA graduates salary being higher with their having been better educated for business. They must be better if they get paid more, right? Sounds like the authors must have done a recent economics course.

They toss finance and strategy in with economics. WTF? While the management subjects are HR management, leadership and organisation behaviour  the content free zones of the MBA. I am sure that these courses equip graduates with the confidence and skills to land a good job and quickly glad hand their way up the corporate ladder. But does their fluency in management speak actually add any value to their organisation? It is the shameless bullshit factor at US business school that does the harm (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/education/article5821706.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and I am afraid that the source of the infection is the management courses of MBAs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear,<br />
These researchers conflate MBA graduates salary being higher with their having been better educated for business. They must be better if they get paid more, right? Sounds like the authors must have done a recent economics course.</p>
<p>They toss finance and strategy in with economics. WTF? While the management subjects are HR management, leadership and organisation behaviour  the content free zones of the MBA. I am sure that these courses equip graduates with the confidence and skills to land a good job and quickly glad hand their way up the corporate ladder. But does their fluency in management speak actually add any value to their organisation? It is the shameless bullshit factor at US business school that does the harm (see <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/education/article5821706.ece">here</a>) and I am afraid that the source of the infection is the management courses of MBAs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://clubtroppo.com.au/2009/06/18/why-the-hyper-rationality-of-economics-isnt-so-good-as-a-management-education/#comment-358483</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clubtroppo.com.au/?p=8715#comment-358483</guid>
		<description>In short, if you want to economise[sic] study economics, if you want to manage, study management?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In short, if you want to economise[sic] study economics, if you want to manage, study management?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

