Mind the Gap

Several years ago I posted a graphic plotting countrys GDP per head against mean lifetime and drawing attention to the tragic loss of life in southern Africa, mainly due to AIDS. There is a fantastic data visualisation tool called GapMinder that tells this story and other  stories-  much more clearly. And it is really fun to play with.

Click HERE to open the tool in another window at a much sexier version of the original graphic (for the year 2007).  You need Flash 7 and it may take 30 seconds to load but it is worth the wait.

A quick explanation. Each point is a country and upper right means high GDP and high life expectancy. GDP is on a log-scale partly because the distribution is so skew, but also because the relationship is almost linear that way. Colours are different continents with Africa in blue. Size of the blob is population size probably not of primary interest here. But the really cool thing here is the last dimension time. Move the slider back to 1800 and hit the play button to see the data displayed in sequence for the past 200 years.

My original interest in these data was the AIDS epidemic in Africa. Focusing on the blue swarm of African nations, you will see that there was virtually no improvement in life expectancy until after WW2. Over the past 30 years however, you will also see the blue swarm stagnate to the bottom left. Then, during the past decade about 10 middle income countries just drop through the floor. Pretty stark it is.

You can follow individual countries just by clicking on them (or on their name in the list at the right). Below is the trajectory for Iraq. What do you think happened in 1979?

Other countries whose trajectory has a story to tell – Rwanda but ther civil war was devastating it  pre-genocide (1994), Chile which did well after Pinochet (1974) but was doing extremely well in terms of life expectancy before 1974. Check out Russia…it hardly looks like the wall coming down was a resounding success.

Let’s get parochial. Apart from minor glitches after the great depression and WW2, Australia has enjoyed an uninteresting march towards wealth and health. Give me a boring trajectory any old time. For those who ever doubted that NZ was the eighth state, look at their trajectory at the same time as ours. Peas in a pod.

China watchers might like to focus on the middle kingdom around the late 1950s. I was actually impressed that they managed to get data on life expectancy from a nation that does not like its dirty linen aired. But this thought process led me to a more obvious question – what does life expectancy mean for 2007? This has to be a model projection – it is not really data at all. So I checked the documentation and it is defined as the number of years a newborn child would live if current mortality patterns were to stay the same. In Chinas case then this would mean that the drop we see is an extrapolation of what would have happened if the great leap forward continued indefinitely. Ditto Rwanda. It is certainly not the case that the babies who were born in Rwanda in 1991 will have a mean life of 24 years.

I look forward to the inclusion of 2008 and 2009 data so we can see the ffect of the GFC and how it is differentially felt in different countries. Look out for the Icelandic bubble to bounce faster than Novak Jokivich’s service routine.  You can waste hours playing with this site. There is a huge range of economic, environmental, health, education and demographic measured to select from.

If you want to use this tool for your own data.. .. you can’t. But GapMinder suggest using Motion Chart, which is a free gadget in Google Spreadsheet (an online spreadsheet similar to excel).

Cross Posted at CoreEcon and Fishing in the Bay.

This entry was posted in History, Interesting Graphs. Bookmark the permalink.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
SJ
SJ
14 years ago

Thanks for that, Chris, I hadn’t seen it before. It’s useful in all sorts of ways.

For example:

Brad Delong has postulated recently that 1870 was a turning point in incomes in the West (though Brad incorrectly calls it an “inflection point”). What Brad is talking about is income of the average worker, with 1870 being the time when there was a sudden shift away from and above subsistence levels.

GapMinder shows that Brad is correct, for the U.S., and allowing a few years either side, for the other colonies or former colonies of Britain.

I know this probably isn’t what you had in mind with your post, but thanks anyway. :)

Nicholas Gruen
Admin
14 years ago

Thx – the other thing that stands out on a quick squiz is that even way back in the nineteenth century the Scandinavian countries had great life expectancies even though their incomes were lower than eg Great Britain. They were converting their income into life expectancy better than others, and still do.

Patrick
14 years ago

My first introduction to this software was Hans Rosling’s 2006 TED presentation (via Nicholas Gruen!). I strongly recommend that lecture, it is awesome. There is also the 2007 lecture which is in the nature of an update. Both really are worth your time if you haven’t seen them already.