Adam Smith, Galileo and the rise of science

And what is this fetching picture doing here? Ask Google Images which popped this up when I entered the search string "the rise of science"

In discussing ‘open science’ with someone today I thought I’d be able to refer him to a speech I’d given in late 2008 on Troppo.  Alas it wasn’t there.  I think the reason it wasn’t there is that it had been worked up from an earlier speech on Adam Smith, science and economics as the latter speech was written at short notice, so I decided at the time not to post the more developed one. But since a few years have passed, those who read the earlier shorter speech here, may not mind running into a reminder, and there is also a fair bit of content that wasn’t in the original outlining the idea of the rise of open science which wasn’t in the earlier speech and some other stuff for instance on intrinsic motivation – which again is something which is inexplicably absent in most discussion of Serious Things.

Anyway, for those who are interested, here’s the speech.

Scientists, economists, and other rent seeking creatures I have known: Recollections of a dismal scientist, Speech at the Adelaide Festival Centre for the Adelaide Research and Innovation !mpact Awards, 27th November 2008

You may be wondering who I am and what the hell I’m doing here tonight. You’ll be dismayed to know that I’m wondering the same thing. More worrying still, so are the organisers of this fine event.

Let me explain. A few months ago the Chief Scientist Jim Peacock rang and told me that he’d come to think of my contributions to the Innovation Review as so witty that he thought that if I turned up and gave a speech to the CSIRO scientists in Canberra everyone could have a good laugh.

I note he didn’t say ‘witty and wise’, but then that was just as well as it halved my level of performance anxiety.

Anyway, immediately I got off the phone, the saying that came to my terrified mind was the one attributed to Abraham Lincoln. “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”

I nearly rang back and cancelled, but then I realised that, from what the Chief Scientist had said, all I really needed to do was fool all of the people in the room for about fifteen minutes.

A few months later Jim got a phone call from Adelaide from the Organisers of these science awards. They thought they’d lined up tonight’s speaker – Jim’s successor as Chief Scientist Penny Sackett. But there was a clash. The previous speaker was Tim Flannery.

They’d heard about a young American up and comer who gave a good speech, but Barack Obama was busy. Anyway Jim had an idea. It seems I passed the audition in Canberra, and here I am tonight – freshly minted talent on the speaking circuit.

But the organisers are raising the bar. A bigger room, more people, a longer speech and bow ties and beautiful gowns.

So here I go. Three or four minutes already gone.

Please don’t refrain from having a few more drinks as I speak. Continue reading

Missing Link Friday – 15 April 2011

In this week’s Missing Link Friday: a British conservative blames women for inequality, Australia’s PM celebrates the dignity of work, Americans argue about health care spending, and the Freakonomics blog reveals the damaging environmental impact of medical marijuana.

Is feminism to blame for increasing inequality?

British Conservative Party politician, David Willetts recently told journalists that feminism had trumped egalitarianism. Women were now taking university places that might otherwise have gone to ambitious working class men. At Topsoil, Beth is alarmed:

Willetts’ remarks are hate speech. It’s serious. A cabinet minister is telling us that women’s slightly improved position is the cause of men’s joblessness or low wages. Don’t think that this has no effect. Don’t think that there are no angry, disenfranchised men reading this article in the Mail or the Telegraph who resent their powerlessness, who are looking for explanations, who have wives, daughters, female co-workers.

At Hoyden about town Blue Milk half agrees with Willetts but goes on to say: "Feminism might have contributed to income inequality over the last couple of decades but how the world responded to rising income inequality isn’t the fault of feminism."

Get a job

"That old chestnut the welfare cheat has returned to distract the gullible", writes Trevor Cook. Julia Gillard’s speech on The Dignity of Work attracted the attention of Australian bloggers this week. Mark Bahnisch at Larvatus Prodeo wasn’t impressed:

Continue reading

Lies, damn lies and poker machines

With miners and tobacco companies running well-funded campaigns against perectly reasonable government policies, it’s hardly surprising that the licensed clubs industry is looking at similar measures to combat imposition of compulsory pre-commitment settings on poker machines for all players.  They’re already cranking up threats to influence the gullible:

Clubs in NSW must spend 1.5 per cent of poker machine revenue over $1 million on community programs, and they have warned that their sponsorship of local sports teams and charities will be slashed if mandatory poker machine restrictions are introduced. …

The marketing manager of Bankstown Sports Club, Chris Passanah,  … said the club’s charity funding would be slashed if the poker machine legislation was passed and revenue dropped. ”It will kill us – the mandatory nature and getting people to sign up to a form. We will have to pull back from the community.”

In fact there’s scant basis for this scare campaign, as South Australian field trials of the technology last year demonstrated:

Continue reading

Planned outage this Sunday

Hello all, your friendly Ozblogistan tyrant here.

To perform some important maintenance on the site, it will be necessary to deactivate all Ozblogistan blogs temporarily on Sunday afternoon. I am expecting to take the site down around 2pm, central standard time, for up to two hours.

Tipping – the hidden American tax

Fairfax columnist John Birmingham’s column raises some interesting issues about the practice of tipping for provision of goods and services, especially the aggressive way tipping is pursued in the US where restaurant tips of up to 20% of the bill appear to be the norm.  In Australia tipping is nowhere near as ubiquitous, and anyone who tips much more than 10% of the bill in a restaurant is a grandstanding wanker.

Birmingham observes:

Here in Oz, despite the best efforts of some in the hospitality industry, we remain feckless and lackadaisical tipsters. Is it because we’re all just tight bastards with a dollar, or because we assume people are properly paid here?

Are they?

I gotta confess I wouldn’t have a clue.

Clearly research isn’t Birmingham’s specialty. It took me only a couple of minutes Googling to find the answer. The minimum wage in Australia is currently $15 per hour, and our dollar and cost of living are roughly equivalent to the US.  According to Wikipedia anyway, the US situation is very different:

As of July 24, 2009, the federal minimum wage in the United States is $7.25 per hour. Some states and municipalities have set minimum wages higher than the federal level (see List of U.S. minimum wages), with the highest state minimum wage being $8.67 in Washington. Some U.S. territories (such as American Samoa) are exempt. Some types of labor are also exempt, and tipped labor must be paid a minimum of $2.13 per hour, as long as the hourly wage plus tipped income result in a minimum of $7.25 per hour.

You can see why American service industry employees are so aggressively insistent on coercing customers to tip.  They’d starve to death if they didn’t.

Given this effective legal compulsion underpinning tipping in the US, it occurs to me that it bears most of the attributes of a consumption tax on goods and services, and a very heavy one at that, with the proceeds instantly distributed to the low-paid by market forces. 11. KP: In the Blank Tapes Case in 1993, the High Court held the Keating government’s proposed royalty on blank cassette tapes to be a tax, even though it was collected by tape retailers and sent straight to copyright collection societies for distribution to copyright holders.  That is, the revenue was not collected by government nor did it ever pass through government coffers (which is part of the reason why the Court found the tax was unconstitutional).  US-style tipping is more efficient, in that the intended recipients collect the “tax” for themselves. []   Of course there’s no legal compulsion to tip so it isn’t formally a tax on the classic Australian legal definition.  However, anyone who has forgotten to tip in the US would know exactly how ‘voluntary’ the practice actually is.

If one regards tipping as taxation, I strongly suspect that the ostensibly low US total tax take wouldn’t look anywhere near as impressive by comparison with the supposedly high-taxing socialist Europeans.  I wonder if any economist has crunched the numbers based on some reasonable estimate of the total value of tips in the US compared with Europe or Australia?  Of course, to be fair you’d also need to measure the extent to which tipping operates as an income-redistribution mechanism.  Presumably that adjustment would also show US income inequality to be not quite as radically different from the Europeans as it seems (unless Gini and similar measures already adjust for this, which I’m hoping someone might be able to tell me).

Guest post from Dave Bath – can we please have RSS feeds from Auditors General (and other agencies methinks [NG])

A very reasonable request – so it seems to me – from Dave Bath who has asked me to post the guest post below. I guess there’s a message there – not just for Auditors General but for all right thinking government agencies.

It’s bleg time… for people who’d like to get all Auditor General offices to provide an RSS feed of announcements and reports.  I’m after ideas (a list of questions near the bottom of the post) and even cosignatories for a request that each audit office provide such a feed.

These days, with Gov 2.0 a buzz-word, and given the excellent work by Troppo’s own Nicholas Gruen, you would expect almost all agencies to provide RSS feeds, and preferably, like the parliament, a range of news feeds for different purposes.

You might expect that an Auditor General would provide RSS feeds, as such an agency is not responsible to the executive, but to the parliament.

Yet only the audit offices of Western Australia (http://www.audit.wa.gov.au) and the federal ANAO (http://www.anao.gov.au) provide RSS feeds.

Continue reading