Manly and Collingwood

The two finals for the oval ball codes do not just share a weekend this year. Two of the finalists – Collingwood in the AFL and Manly in the NRL – have the undisputed status of being “the team everyone likes to hate” in their respective leagues. Yet they are far from similar clubs and the root of this hate is a striking contrast.

The source of hatred for Manly is easy to understand. Manly are “silvertails”, a moniker popularised by Roy Masters whilst coaching Western Suburbs in the late 1970s. Wests were then based in Lidcombe and Masters developed a mythology of class resentment for his under resourced team of “fibros”. It managed to inspire a brutal theatre for audiences, but ultimately failed on two counts – they didn’t win a premiership and rather than inspiring a siege mentality against all of Wests’ opponents, it instead inspired a league wide hatred of the prosperous, well resourced, player stealing team ensconced on the insular peninsular. The ultimate beneficiary was Newcastle in 1997. This folklore still inspires documentaries today.

Collingwood - Stereotyped

The hatred of Collingwood is less easily encapsulated. Occasionally someone will suggest it is due to resentment of the team’s early 20th century success, which seems unlikely. Was dislike transmitted by geriatric fans that could actually remember Collingwood success? And why did the same resentment fall on teams like St George or South Sydney whom had similar periods of dominance in league? Over the years I’ve asked people, and searched internet forums and when one got past vague generalisations that could apply to any team, certain imagery made a habit of reappearing . Of “rats”, of “tatts”, of “flanno” and “missing teeth” [fn1] and of “Winnie Reds up sleeves”. Or I could just browse the facebook page devoted to asking “Why are Collingwood supporters roaming the streets? Shouldn’t they be in jail?”, or this one, or this one…. Hmm….

When the Western Suburbs Magpies consciously adopted proletarian semiotics, their Emmanuel Goldstein drew everyone else’s hate. When these semiotics are applied to the Collingwood Magpies, they became Goldstein.

Why this difference? It’s unlikely to be a root difference in the culture of the cities that form the core of each competition given Sydney and Melbourne are as alike as any two large cities in the world (the narcissism of small differences notwithstanding). Topography does make class differences more apparent in Sydney, but how would this explain this observed difference?

An Age article last year suggested that  sectarian hate against the Catholic Collingwood had residual effects today. This is tempting on one level since an anti-papist strain in Aussie Rules would fit well with the code’s resolute Englishness. Yet the sectarian divide has been knocked down so well that we can blithely refer to an “Anglo-Celtic” Australia in discussions of multiculturalism and not even consider how peculiar it is to have a string of Catholics lead the tories, let alone one possessed by the ghost of B.A Santamaria. Why would this residual remain so strong. Additionally, what to make of the Canterbury Bulldogs. They are associated with Catholicism’s successors as chosen reviled religious minority (Islam) just to add to the way their fans were unfairly characterised as violent, the team proved to be cheats and accused to be rapists. But they are not reviled as Manly is.

There is something in the religion question though. The lore about pre-war NSW was that professional and public life required a trifecta. One chose either a UAP branch, a masonic lodge and a Rugby Union club, or chose a Labor branch, a Catholic church and a Rugby League club. Sport, religion and class were always closely intertwined. But where in Sydney and Rugby the divides were between codes, in Melbourne and Australian Rules divides were within the code.

The entire code of Rugby League was working class by virtue of its split from Rugby Union. Subsequently for decades it could be used to evoke a proletarianism either bleak and present, or romanticised and past. Manly were a sore thumb in this equation and thus reviled. Victorian, and later Australian rules was more reflective of society as a whole, and thus could reflect a basic human tendency. As Adam Smith would recognise, the hate for Collingwood is merely “the contempt, of which vice and folly are the only proper objects, is often most unjustly bestowed upon poverty and weakness, [that] has been the complaint of moralists in all ages.”

I am reliably informed that this is not Troppo contributor and Collingwood fan Nicholas Gruen.

Which  brings us to a last point. The AFL is expending millions to gain a beachhead in Western Sydney – the region seems to carry the same mythical power in sport as it does in political discourse. A great deal of fanfare has been made about a base for the Giants in socioeconomically disadvantaged Blacktown – journalists writing safari tales about their journey into the suburbs[fn2] and inane (and inaccurate) quips about struggling to find coffee. Ultimately the decision was made to play games at the Sydney Showground at Homebush on the basis that it would be more accessible, or at least more appealing, to the main potential fan base in the Hills District. Prior to this the main stadium events associated with the Hills District was Hillsong’s prosperity preaching spectaculars. I guess the imagined sore support is a demographic that despises league in the same way Collingwood is despised, but didn’t go to the right schools to pretend that Union is interesting.

But if Smith (and Paul Frijters) is right about human nature, then the AFL is set for victory over the NRL in the long run. League has chosen to despise the privileged. Australian Rules chooses to despise those of poor and mean condition. The latter inclination is that of the broader swathe of humanity.

[fn1] I started googling for an image with “Collingwood supporter” and google suggested “Collingwood supporter no teeth”. Google’s suggestions are an interesting way of mapping human prejudice.

[fn2] A journalistic conceit that already had a long history when Dianne Powell documented it in 1993.

6 thoughts on “Manly and Collingwood

  1. Richard you underestimate the tall poppy factor with Collingwood. Richmond was historically Catholic as well, and the Bulldogs and North just as working class. None of those teams generate anything like the antipathy Collingwood do. In fact the “salt of the earth” nature makes many people affectionate towards the latter two clubs.

    Collingwood are the superpower whose supporters outnumber opposition fans even at most away games – the antipathy has greatly increased as the club as kept doing better on the field in the last decade, as well as adding the flash home base and celebrity president.

    That’s the core of the hate. I’ve seen it in English Soccer fans that love to dump on Man United. The class thing is just the convenient club to hit the mighty Magpies with.

    Full Disclosure – I’m a Collingwood supporter.

  2. Growing up an Essendon supporter and a Catholic roughly of the BA Santamaria type, I hated Collingwood, and still do. I also hated Carlton, perhaps, now that I think about it, for the reasons you outline with respect of Manly.

    I must admit it was not until the tail end of my twenties that I ever wondered why I would hate any teams, although I did sometime well earlier realise that hate was by far too strong a word.

    What I find now that I have drifted away from AFL is that I can rather dispassionately watch it and appreciate whoever is playing (unless they are beating Essendon) but I prefer to know that Collingwood and Carlton are losing/struggling on the ladder. Even if I can happy watch them play – the world is somehow ‘right’, admittedly to an almost negligble degree these days, when Essendon is up and they are down.

    But the real reason AFL will beat Rugby, Union as well, alas!, is the reasons outlined by me and a few others in Ken’s recent thread: their organisation and spending on junior development.

  3. As a former Melburnian but now resident in Sydney, Collingwood were a joke for decades after their 1958 premiership because of their habit of coming second in Grand Finals. When my family and I visited Melbourne in 1981 I took my sone to the MCG on Boxing Day to see the test match against the West Indies. It was a great day’s play, and in the last half hour the Indies went into bat and Dennis Lillee got stuck into them. Viv Richards got out on the last ball of the day to make the score 4/10.

    During that last half-hour a number of early leavers made their way towards the exits to enable them to beat the crowd. In our bay in the stand, one wag screamed out at them: “Why the hell are you lot leaving? Are you all Collingwood supporters?” You had to be a Melburnian to understand what he meant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.