Republican proofing Obama

http://conservativeoutpost.com/files/u3/Hillary_vs_Obama.jpgHillary is hopping into Obama any way she knows how. Jonathon Chait takes up the story.

The morning after Tuesday’s primaries, Hillary Clinton’s campaign released a memo titled “The Path to the Presidency.” I eagerly dug into the paper, figuring it would explain how Clinton would obtain the Democratic nomination despite an enormous deficit in delegates. Instead, the memo offered a series of arguments as to why Clinton should run against John McCain–i.e., “Hillary is seen as the one who can get the job done”–but nothing about how she actually could. Is she planning a third-party run? Does she think Obama is going to die? The memo does not say.

The reason it doesn’t say is that Clinton’s path to the nomination is pretty repulsive. She isn’t going to win at the polls. Barack Obama has a lead of 144 pledged delegates. That may not sound like a lot in a 4,000-delegate race, but it is. Clinton’s Ohio win reduced that total by only nine. She would need 15 more Ohios to pull even with Obama. She isn’t going to do much to dent, let alone eliminate, his lead.

That means, as we all have grown tired of hearing, that she would need to win with superdelegates. But, with most superdelegates already committed, Clinton would need to capture the remaining ones by a margin of better than two to one. And superdelegates are going to be extremely reluctant to overturn an elected delegate lead the size of Obama’s. The only way to lessen that reluctance would be to destroy Obama’s general election viability, so that superdelegates had no choice but to hand the nomination to her. Continue reading

Social Media in Australia – Can the madness of crowds help sort the digital deluge?

Guest Post by Dan Walsh of Kwoff.com.au.

For some time I’ve straddled two digital worlds. My ‘hi geek’ dual monitor setup allows me to read my daily dose of Crikey on one screen and the constant stream of tech news from Digg.com on the other. One world is determined by an editor, the other by the wisdom/madness of crowds. I love both, and cant live without either.

I know I’m not alone.

Australians are serious contributors to, and consumers of, ‘Social News’ sites like Digg. They produce no actual content but act as a digital index that ranks submissions based on votes. Anyone can vote and people can submit whatever they like – blog, picture, video, mainstream news etc. The result is filtered content, ‘wheat from the chaff’ style; it helps sort through the deluge that is online content.

Equally, Australians have taken to new media sites such as Club Troppo and Crikey in droves, our online participation rate is high. Telstra bandwidth issues aside, we are excellent digital citizens.

However, the two worlds arent currently mixing all that well. If i try and apply Australian issues to offshore Social News sites we simply do not rate. Unless Kevin Rudd calls Barack Obama on a gold plated Iphone it doesnt cut thru.

Stephen Mayne and I spent some time discussing this earlier this year and lured Greg Barns on board to help us launch a local Social News experiment called www.kwoff.com.au.

The site has been up for the last month and has attracted some interesting items, users and content, but has a way to go. Club Troppo readers represent Australia’s digital ‘Upper Class’ and we’d love to see you throw a couple of suggestions/brickbats at us.

We hope to evolve the site as we try and position ourselves in a field of similar services, somewhere to the side of MySpace and slightly overlapping Facebook and Del.icio.us (note: i’m an avid del.icio.us user and think it serves Australian users well).

The exciting array of blogs and ezines that have arrived in recent years provide an original, alternative to mainstream news here in Australia. However, they can be hard to find for the uninitiated and time starved. Mainstream news sites, often variations on an AAP theme, provide the easy first and last option for many Australians. I’d like to blur the line between the two.

Social media can present a view of both worlds to those without the time to spend the day searching for interesting online content. Gems can be found on mainstream news sites but many more are buried in the blogosphere, Flickr, YouTube and the like. Collectively we hold the key.

Literary Blogging on ABC RN

The Book Show picked up the theme of blogging today. I’m a complete fan of the Book Show – how they pump out 40 odd minutes of good content each day beats me. Ramona Koval is a good sort – good fun to listen to. Unfortunately, like so many MSM encounters with blogdom, it was a bit of a disappointment, featuring Susan Wyndham an MSM literary commentator who dabbles in a blog on the side and someone who was bemoaning the way in which the blogging world is reducing the authority of the print medium. His views were fine, but why they didn’t have anyone on from Sarsparilla or Matlida beats me.

Blog Software: Who Cares?

In my last entry on this topic, I outlined at a very high level that I felt the time had come for a fourth generation of social software. I promised at the time that I would begin my ruminations on the topic by examining the interests of the many stakeholders in the blog platform game.

Incidentally, I hate the word “stakeholder”, a word which escaped from the gambling lexicon into the synergising empowering vocabulary enablement of MANAGERIAL.

A cursory search using Google Images reveals that this word has only two (possibly) redeeming features:

  1. It keeps graphic design artists gainfully employed producing grids, circles, pinwheels and other pretty ways of expressing who cares about something, and
  2. No weird fetish porn turns up on the first search result page.

However it has been thoroughly corrupted and debased by usage in documents composed of MANAGERIAL. And so, for the purposes for this foray into the world of people who care about blogging software, I will instead use the term only slightly less odious term “participant”.

Broadly, I divide participants into three classes:
Continue reading

Blogging: The Next Generation

Geekery has deep roots in many sources: Tolkien, Star Trek, Star Wars, various fantasy and science fiction novels, roleplaying games, the legendary hacker cultures of MIT, Stanford, UCB and others, the experiences of Usenet and so on and so forth.

One of the ideas which escaped from Star Trek into the lexicon of geekery is “TNG”, an abbreviation for The Next Generation. TNG is usually applied to projects which try reimagine and reimplement older systems in the light of experiences learnt.

I am thinking that the time to TNG blogging software has now arrived. Previously I have written about the pre-history of blogging with the complaint that a lot of features from the first and second generations have not yet made it to the third generation. I also speculated briefly about what features a fourth generation might embrace.

Over the next few weeks I am planning to explore this problem space a bit more. I plan to ask: who are the stakeholders for blogging software? What are the traps in developing a new system? What might a new system look like? What tools will make life easier? More difficult?

But to start with, why bother writing a new generation?

Continue reading