This interesting feature from the Washington Post canvasses the emergent academic field of – yes – “White Studies.” Before you’re overwhelmed with images of white sheet wearers, burning crosses and rousing choruses of the Horst Wessel Lied, I should offer some reassurance: White Studies isn’t about celebrating whiteness. Au contraire …….
Recent Comments
- David Walker on Big infrastructure, big uncertainty
- John on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- Geoff Edwards on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- John Quiggin on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Not Trampis on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- Ken Parish on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- John on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- John on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- Nicholas Gruen on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Ken Parish on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Ken Parish on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Ken Parish on Anyone know a good web designer?
- Geoff Edwards on Anyone know a good web designer?
- Geoff Edwards on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Not Trampis on John Quiggin and the Overton Gradient
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Categories
-
Authors
Archives
Author login and feeds
Academic
Alternative media (Australian)
Alternative media (international)
Arts
Business
Centrist
Economics and public policy
Left-leaning
Legal
Online media digests
Psephology/elections
Right-leaning
G’day Geoff,
What little I know about this suggests the ‘white in the title refers to the concept of whiteness and the historical role it’s had since its inception (which it typically dates to the 16th century, if memory serves). Guess the implication is that the way we do this particular mode of prejudice was a function of modern imperialism and slavery rather than its explanation.
All of the above is subject to change if I find out I’m inventing rather than remembering.