Common Sense

Alex White at Psephological Catechism has published an article on his blog about Labor’s need to articulate a different vision of Australia. I couldn’t agree with him more. John Howard’s “ordinariness” and his identification as the quintessential avuncular Aussie have been a big part of his success. Howard, in Gramscian like fashion, has conjured up a narrative of what it is to be Australian that has successfully detached a large number of former Labor voters from their allegiance.

Chris Sheil captured this in more theoretical terms at the start of the election campaign:

Thinking of music as we brace for this week’s hostilities, it’s also useful to think of election campaigns in the terms often used by the great Italian revolutionary, and BP-favoured theorist, Antonio Gramsci. The good campaign is a connected campaign; a ‘natural’ campaign; one that is what the brilliant Antonio called “organic”, which is one rooted in the complex of relationships that comprise the social unit. This is to be contrasted with campaigning by “juxtaposition”, the campaign that presumes to be part of social relations just because it’s there. The organic campaign developes between the party and the citizens through what our theorist called “a molecular process”; through a gradual process of “reciprocal fusion and assimilation” at all sorts of levels of complexity and simplicity, with a dialectical taking and giving of what connects. The juxtaposed campaign attempts to force the issue, demanding attention outright and presuming relevance by hitting people over the head with rhetorical pieces of four-by-two. All campaigns no doubt combine elements of both styles, but there are no prizes for guessing which side has almost all its bullets in a sharply juxtaposed gun at this stage.

Another way of saying this is that you’re either campaigning with the grain – picking up on what people already think about political issues – or against the grain – trying to shift their viewpoint in the course of an election campaign. The latter is not at all easy. You need rather to have a vision of where you want to go, and disseminate this widely and over a long period of time – at grassroots level, through books, through media op/ed, through speeches.

Alex is right to think that the Howardians have both tapped into a common sense understanding of Australian society, values and politics, and that they have themselves shifted this common sense in their preferred direction.

Memo to Labor: It’s not just the leader. It’s the vision, stupid.

NOTE: BackPages alumni will find an old friend appearing in Alex’ comments thread.

About Mark Bahnisch

Mark Bahnisch is a sociologist and is the founder of this blog. He has an undergraduate degree in history and politics from UQ, and postgraduate qualifications in sociology, industrial relations and political economy from Griffith and QUT. He has recently been awarded his PhD through the Humanities Program at QUT. Mark's full bio is on this page.
This entry was posted in Politics - national, Society, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alex White
2021 years ago

Thanks for the mention. I’ve updated my own post with additional thoughts.

I don’t think an election campaign is the time for attempting to create an organic political response to conservatism. An organic movement must exist prior to the election and then drive the campaign with the support of its social and community roots.

Scott Wickstein
2021 years ago

Ah. A jargon fest. That will get the punters flocking to the cause.

yellowvinyl
yellowvinyl
2021 years ago

Scott, it’s not Chris’ most transparent writing to be sure but sometimes jargon helps to make a complex point. I found Mark’s translation in the next para quite clear.

nick paul
nick paul
2021 years ago

last election, i didn’t see much going against the grain from either major party.

Libs seem to be much more adept at the going with strategy.

Homer Paxton
Homer Paxton
2021 years ago

Chris’s piece is a good example of what happens to people who listen to Eric Clapton.

What did he say?