This is not an easy read for philosophical amateurs like myself, but its a good one. “G¶del and the nature of mathematical truth”. Ends with a bit of a bang too.
This is not an easy read for philosophical amateurs like myself, but its a good one. “G¶del and the nature of mathematical truth”. Ends with a bit of a bang too.
Correction, the article is pretty easy to read – it’s an interview so it can’t be too hard. Godel’s proof is however explained (I guess they’d say ‘motivated’ in a maths class) and that takes a bit of concentration. But its a great article – I reckon.
i’ve read it a couple a months ago, I guess I must be one of the jazzier ones, of course, just because you discover something (lets call it ‘x’) doesn’t mean your biases/preference in a bounded ir/rational world will be right everywhere (x-aleph).
Even g
its in her genes, she can’t help it
Here’s a follow-up interview, also at Edge, also on Godel:
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/vhd05/vhd05_index.html
Sorry, it’s not an interview. It’s a hatchet job – but a first rate one for all that.
thanks gummo
Both interviews are wonderfully clear.
A favorite bit of Hofstadter