I’ve just done a biography of my dear old Dad for Wikipedia. He may or may not be resting in peace, but he’s now reposing in Wikipedia. For those readers of this blog knew him they might like to refine the entry and others may find it of some interest. He had a more exciting life than those of us in later generations.
Recent Comments
- Not Trampis on John Quiggin and the Overton Gradient
- Nicholas Gruen on John Quiggin and the Overton Gradient
- Chris Lloyd on John Quiggin and the Overton Gradient
- Nicholas Gruen on Market – what market? The catch 22 that stops ‘scaling’ innovation in government in its tracks
- Nicholas Gruen on Standards Part One (and now Parts Two and Three): Standards as windows on an alternative universe
- Australia’s Lost Policy Exceptionalism w/ Nicholas Gruen – EP248 – Economics Explored on Compare and contrast
- Stations of the cross: The tenth anniversary of The Cluetrain Manifesto | Woolly Days on Adam Smith 2.0: Emergent Public Goods, Intellectual Property and the Rhetoric of Remix
- Wade on Blinded by the Moon?
- Nicholas Gruen on Standards Part One (and now Parts Two and Three): Standards as windows on an alternative universe
- Nicholas Gruen on The academy and partners try wellbeing frameworks
- Anon on Child abuse? Not in the “good old days”
- A metaphor, a hack, a ladder: On the difficulty of telling yourself the truth | Club Troppo on Strategic planning, strategic diagrams and complete nonsense
- Nicholas Gruen on Escape from planet sensible: Stunning listening
- John on Australian male violence against women: what the statistics say (and media should report)
- rog2 on Escape from planet sensible: Stunning listening
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Categories
-
Authors
Archives
Author login and feeds
Academic
Alternative media (Australian)
Alternative media (international)
Arts
Business
Centrist
Economics and public policy
Left-leaning
Legal
Online media digests
Psephology/elections
Right-leaning
Hi Nicholas,
while your father’s career certainly makes it completely appropriate for there to be a Wikipedia entry on him, this entry will probably get fairly severely edited for both content and tone.
One problem is that many of your personal and family recollections, unless they are documented somewhere else, are unverifiable as far as the Wikipedia is concerned. Anecdotes such as holding the cigarette for the Australian guard, will probably have to go unless they’re documented elsewhere; it’s great material for a personally-authored biographical sketch, but it’s not suitable for an impersonal Wikipedia article.
On a stylistic point, Wikipedia articles tend to be as dry as dust, trying to avoid interpreting facts as much as possible. This may make for slightly less compelling reading, but it also avoids a lot of arguments.
Might I suggest you post the original version on your own website, which can then be used as a secondary source for the Wikipedia article?
By the way, I’ve begun the editing process by adding Wiki links to other relevant articles (for instance, to John Quiggin, who has a Wikipedia biography). Other things to note include that Wikipedia likes subheadings (for instance, I’d probably add something like “early life and education”, “Monash years”, “the tarriff debate”, “legacy”, and maybe “retirement”, and images always lighten up an article, so if you have a good photo of your father that you own the copyright to and don’t mind making available, that would be good.
But thanks for adding the article, by the way. It’s fascinating to see the origins (well, at least, a major point in the history) of topics that dominated our political history for much of the 1970s and 1980s.
Trackback
Sorry Andrew, we had to turn off html in comments again due to a spam deluge. We’re working on a new home for Troppo, where anti-spam measures will hopefully be more advanced and will allow full html in comments to be available.
Thanks very much Robert.
I figured that there must be lots of people who do this, and am kind of heartened that Wikipedia would cut the bio back as it was something of a personal indulgence (in the context of an encyclopedia) though I don’t think there’s a problem with some of the more ‘human’ and interprative stuff. I’ll follow your suggestion and post it on http://www.gruen.com.au and also perhaps here at some stage.
Here’s the trackback I was trying to post: http://imaginingaustralia.blogs.com/imagining/2005/10/whatever_makes_.html
It was really nice to read this. I might try to add something about Fred’s contributions in areas like housing policy. Someone ought to write an entry on the Dunera also: a list of some of the more prominent passengers would provide a good starting point for further entries.
Nicholas
I’d love to see you post the entry about your father directly here at Troppo. Perhaps even a slightly expanded version, not constrained by any need to stick with an encyclopedia-like format or style.
One of the potentially wonderful things about the blogging format IMO is the possibility of exploring the divide/interrelationship between the personal and political, to the enhancement of both. Although there might sometimes be a danger of self-indulgence in that sort of approach, I think it’s a risk worth taking.
I’ve been too busy with the personal(and work stuff) recently to have time to write about it, but that doesn’t mean I just see Troppo as a haven for dessicated, impersonal intellectualised musings about law, politics and economics.
The Dunera? What’s Bob Hoskins like then?
I don’t know what Bob Hoskins is like, but the Dunera Boys mini-series made me cringe. All those fake European accents and sentimentality. Still, maybe I was too close to it.
Trying to remember the mini-series with what I’ve read of the Dunera since, I think it captured the internee’s joire de vivre quite poorly – by highlighting bits of folklore they thought would appeal to Aussies.
As I (dimly) recall, they made much of the Dunera Boys calling Australia ‘Goodonia’, something I find hard to believe and have never heard any Dunera Boy mention.