I have only been keeping a casual eye on this – but this post is very enlightening.
Recent Comments
- Vox pop journalism as a system of domination: Peter Dutton edition | Club Troppo on Journalism as a system of domination: Syriza edition
- Orwell that ends well: Can evaluation save us from ourselves? | Club Troppo on Family by Family: the column
- Nicholas Gruen on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Nicholas Gruen on Building the public goods of the 21st century: Google DeepMind edition
- Antonios Sarhanis on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Moz on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Why I’m not reading Steven Pinker’s latest | Club Troppo on GPI part two
- Why I’m not reading Steven Pinker’s latest | Club Troppo on What’s wrong with the Genuine Progress Indicator? Part One
- Not Trampis on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- R. N. England on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- John walker on Universal basic income: notes of an agnostic
- David Walker on Universal basic income: notes of an agnostic
- David Walker on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Conrad on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- John walker on Elections are all about competition right? (They weren’t way back when)
Categories
-
Authors
Archives
Author login and feeds
Academic
Alternative media (Australian)
Alternative media (international)
Arts
Business
Centrist
Economics and public policy
Left-leaning
Legal
Online media digests
Psephology/elections
Right-leaning
Sport
Said it there and I’ll say it here – lots of people were loudly and lengthily proclaiming that the polls were wrong earlier this year, because they weren’t saying what the betting market was. Now that the market has caught up with the polls, you’ve all gone very quiet. Typical.