Clive Crook guest blogs on Obama for Troppo

Well he doesn’t actually.  I’ve just copied and pasted a post of his on his blog – below the fold.

The contrasting characters (this is not just a matter of style) of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have been prominently on display since the Pennsylvania results came in. Her killer instinct is so much to the fore that it often seems to be her only instinct. It is both her greatest strength (she never quits) and her greatest weakness (she targets, rather than wishing to talk to, those she disagrees with). With Obama, the opposite seems true: his killer instinct seems not just suppressed but entirely absent. Again, this is both a strength (his appealing consensus-seeking temperament) and a weakness (he prefers to roll with the punches rather than striking back).

Today Hillary was telling an audience in Indiana that she now leads in the popular vote for the Democratic nomination. This is true only if you include both Florida and Michiganwhere Obama was not even on the ballot. Her comments made no concession to this fact. She is ahead on the least plausible measure of the popular vote, and behind on the others. No problem: that will serve. And here is another instance glimpsed today. She attacked Obama for allowing that John McCain would at least be a better president than George Bush. No, she insisted. McCain wants to stay in Iraq for 100 years: he is every bit as bad as Bush. Never give the enemy an inch, is her creed. In that single comment she attacked both Obama and McCainunfairly, in both cases, but effectively.

Meanwhile, what was Obama saying? He was telling an audience in Indiana what a good race Hillary had fought in Pennsylvania, what a strong candidate she was, and how he had no doubt that the Democratic party would rally round whoever was nominated. This was beyond gracious: these were sentences from a concession speech. It required the New York Times, in its oddly splenetic editorial, to attack Hillary for fighting a negative campaign. (When they endorsed her, were they expecting the Clintons to take the high road?) Her actual opponent was far kinder.

If Hillary could give Obama some of her taste for the jugularshe has so much to sparethey would both be better candidates.

This entry was posted in Politics - international. Bookmark the permalink.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Niall
13 years ago

Who’s Clive Crook?

Patrick
Patrick
13 years ago

They invented google a little while ago, Niall. You should try it, it’s awesome. I’m even sure that Nick Gruen has blogged about it!

James Farrell
James Farrell
13 years ago

Niall was being supercilious, Patrick. Leave him alone. Everyone should be allowed to play to his strengths.

Patrick
Patrick
13 years ago

I can’t tell anymore, James!

I do love Clive’s punchline though.

Niall
13 years ago

Well done James. Good to know that someone out there has a sense of humour