Copyright “too depressing” blogger’s resignation shock!

Brian Fitzgerald drew my attention to this sad valedictory post at The Patry Copyright Blog.

2. The Current State of Copyright Law is too depressing

This leads me to my final reason for closing the blog which is independent of the first reason: my fear that the blog was becoming too negative in tone. I regard myself as a centrist. I believe very much that in proper doses copyright is essential for certain classes of works, especially commercial movies, commercial sound recordings, and commercial books, the core copyright industries. I accept that the level of proper doses will vary from person to person and that my recommended dose may be lower (or higher) than others. But in my view, and that of my cherished brother Sir Hugh Laddie, we are well past the healthy dose stage and into the serious illness stage. Much like the U.S. economy, things are getting worse, not better. Copyright law has abandoned its reason for being: to encourage learning and the creation of new works. Instead, its principal functions now are to preserve existing failed business models, to suppress new business models and technologies, and to obtain, if possible, enormous windfall profits from activity that not only causes no harm, but which is beneficial to copyright owners. Like HumptyDumpty, the copyright law we used to know can never be put back together again: multilateral and trade agreements have ensured that, and quite deliberately.

It is profoundly depressing, after 26 years full-time in a field I love, to be a constant voice of dissent. I have tried various ways to leaven this state of affairs with positive postings, much like television news shows that experiment with “happy features.” I have blogged about great articles others have written, or highlighted scholars who have not gotten the attention they deserve; I tried to find cases, even inconsequential ones, that I can fawn over. But after awhile, this wore thin, because the most important stories are too often ones that involve initiatives that are, in my opinion, seriously harmful to the public interest. I cannot continue to be so negative, so often. Being so negative, while deserved on the merits, gives a distorted perspective of my centrist views, and is emotionally a downer.

So between the inability or refusal of some people to accept the blog for what it is — a personal blog — and my inability to continue to be Cassandra, I decided it was time to pull the plug. I thank profusely all those who have accepted the blog for what it is, and who have contributed so much to it and to my learning over the years. I intend to spend my free time figuring out a constructive way to talk about the difficult issues we face and how to advance toward their solution.

This entry was posted in Economics and public policy, Law. Bookmark the permalink.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tony T
13 years ago

Pardon moi, if I missed a joke, but I think you’ll find that is The Patry Copyright Blog.

Amanda
13 years ago

The current state of copywright law is too depressing??? Try being a music blogger!

But seriously, that is interesting and actually the bit I found most interesting/depressing was the reason for leaving 1) — people/journos incapable of separating the personal and the professional. And the crazies. It sounds like it was a valuable and interesting resource for people, pity.

Niall
13 years ago

“So between the inability or refusal of some people to accept the blog for what it is a personal blog and my inability to continue to be Cassandra, I decided it was time to pull the plug.”

Such a burden it must be to have a self-expectation of always being right. So what if other people don’t like what’s written. Can’t handle the heat, then surely it IS time to vacate the kitchen.