How to respond to Abbott

On all recent polls, it appears that the Coalition is still unbeatable. But Newspoll suggests that Abbott’s leadership of the Liberal party is viewed with suspicion by the electorate – for good reasons.

First, Abbott has still to reveal how he is going to close the budget black hole of $50 to $70b, without creating a mini-depression and abandoning most of the big handouts to low income and middle income earners. .

Secondly, Abbott is clutching at straws when he says that, under Howard, Australia had a lower public debt than it now has. That is true but it is our relative debt levels which count. Since the financial collapse in 2007, Australia’s public debt has risen much less than in Europe, UK and USA, while the economy is still showing stronger growth and lower unemployment and inflation. And we are still aiming for a budget surplus in a year’s time.

Thirdly, it should be relatively easy to address Abbott’s principal objections to the Government’s minerals and carbon tax. The Government can stress that the minerals resource rent tax is helping to spread the welfare benefits of the mining doom across the nation (giving everyone a fair go) and that the carbon tax will help to minimise welfare losses for future generations (inter-generational equity).

These counter arguments can at least narrow the gap which now exists between the two parties.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

86 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter Mariani
Peter Mariani
12 years ago
Reply to  john walker

The Gittens article seems basically to observe/approve the Howard approach of spend on nothing, keep a pretty surplus and use it for tax cuts when you need to buy an election win. Yep I’m pretty sure Abbott will go back to that as soon as he gets a chance. Whether its the best approach may be another thing to debate though in the light of what was never even attempted in a decade of Howard Government and what was privatised or passed over as too hard like selling off Telstra rather than providing good infrastructure from day 1.

conrad
conrad
12 years ago
Reply to  Peter Mariani

“Yep I’m pretty sure Abbott will go back to that as soon as he gets a chance”

I don’t, since you simply can’t go back to that now, since we are not living in times where there are huge increases in the amount of money coming in for reasons that have nothing to do with government performance. This is one of the big problems for the states now — it’s interesting to see how quickly they are becoming unpopular because of the divide between what they can do and public expectations.

john walker
john walker
12 years ago
Reply to  Peter Mariani

Felt that gittens identified a real schizophrenia- a one step forward and two steps sideways sort of dance- about their approach to policy and spending and also by implication raised the question about how much has been spent on evaluating and beginning policy initiatives(like education, and the Henry review) that somehow have not been quite real.

Simon Musgrave
Simon Musgrave
12 years ago

‘mining doom’ – Freudian slip?

grputland
grputland
12 years ago

To say nothing of Abbott’s selective indignation on “reverse tariffs“.

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

It will change a lot after July.

you can put fear into people about what may happen.

however after it happens and the Abbott hyperbole is seen for what it is then perceptions may change.

For example the GST will have has three times the impact on plane fares the ETS wil have

desipis
12 years ago

These counter arguments can at least narrow the gap which now exists between the two parties.

You seem to be making the assumption that voters make decisions based on rational analysis of proposed or implemented policy.

Peter Patton
Peter Patton
12 years ago

Since the financial collapse in 2007, Australia’s public debt has risen much less than in Europe, UK and USA, while the economy is still showing stronger growth and lower unemployment and inflation.

Er, there was no financial collapse in Australia in 2007, or at any time in my lifetime.

emess
emess
12 years ago
Reply to  Peter Patton

Those who had money in shares and balanced superannuation may beg to differ.

Of course, for those who neither invested in the share market nor superannuation, your comments would seem fair enough.

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

That’s Peter for you.

too many latte’s and he completely forgets.

Mel
Mel
12 years ago

Good points, Fred. The best we can hope for is a one term Abbott Government and Labor getting its act together under a new leader while in opposition.

Yobbo
12 years ago

Why would anyone want Labor to narrow the gap? This government has been the worst in Australian history. What the country needs is 25 years of Liberal government.

conrad
conrad
12 years ago
Reply to  Yobbo

Are you looking forward to a Malcom Fraser revival?

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

Appeals to reason have played only a minor role in Abbott’s currently highly successful populist assault upon the Labor government.

Perhaps appeals to reason may in the end cut through the Liberals’ spooking of the herd. But before that can happen the herd have to resolve to begin to listen to argument.

Thus far, the Gillard government has not found a way to persuade voters to listen engage with debate over policy.

Perhaps a imminent election may induce significant numbers of voters to begin to address issues.

Yobbo
12 years ago

Thus far, the Gillard government has not found a way to persuade voters to listen engage with debate over policy.

Why would anyone want to engage with a bunch of high functioning retards who don’t have a clue what they are doing?

The kneejerk reaction to a biased ABC documentary destroyed a successful Australian industry with 1 stroke of a pen. That’s the kind of action you’d expect from a 16 year old girl, not a group of adults.

The only way this government deserves to be engaged with is by voting them out in the biggest electoral landslide in Australian history, and good riddance.

jennifer
jennifer
12 years ago
Reply to  Yobbo

Agree regarding the cattle industry (presume that is what you are referring to) – and hopefully the damage to the cattlemen will be exposed and inspected and to an extent mitigated through the courts.

But as to the rest, Julia Gillard is proving to be a great administrator (can’t believe I agree with Germaine Greer on this). Why? The government is getting legislation through the parliament. Even though it is embroiled in a nightmarish and relentless election campaign. Legislation is usually suspended during election campaigns but this one is a three year douzy.
But it is obvious the campaign is not going all that well because developing policy and getting legislation passed is clearly distracting the government from more effectively pandering to approval ratings and public perceptions.
Still, back to Gillard; I can’t help but admire the steely resolve it must take to take care of business in such a volatile political climate – and take care of it pretty well too.
…a glasshouse like never before – have to love Tony the sprinter.

Yobbo
12 years ago
Reply to  jennifer

But as to the rest, Julia Gillard is proving to be a great administrator (can’t believe I agree with Germaine Greer on this). Why? The government is getting legislation through the parliament.

Getting terrible legislation through parliament is nothing to be proud of. In fact, it’s a mark of shame for the many ALP MPs who obviously don’t support the policies but vote for them anyway because party solidarity is more important to them than good policy.

jennifer
jennifer
12 years ago
Reply to  Yobbo

… the skill of a administration is just that – getting people to things they might not want to do.
Good God! From Germaine Greer to Sir Humphrey Appleby – Rumple must be next.

Trevor
Trevor
12 years ago
Reply to  Yobbo

I always appreciate a well thought out argument Yobbo – yours is a refreshing departure from the usual ultra-right drivel that pops up from time to time during political discussions.

Tel
Tel
12 years ago

Responding to Abbott won’t change anything, the ALP are doing it to themselves.

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

Yobbo appears to agree with me that the electorate hasn’t so far engaged with the Carbon Tax on the level of policy.

Perhaps Australian voters never will. I’m quite prepared to acknowledge that possibility. On the other hand, those who are prone to the mind projection fallacy would likely be more certain on this point than I am.

Yobbo
12 years ago
Reply to  Katz

The carbon tax is only one of half a dozen incredibly bad policies that this government has saddled us with. There is no need to engage it on a policy level when you can quite easily condemn them for their performance as a whole.

Just a quick recap for those who have forgotten.

Carbon Tax – terrible implementation of an unneccessary and ineffective ta
NBN – outrageous waste of money and destruction of an industry
Live Export ban – destroyed a successful Australian industry to satisfy a few animal rights extremists
Mining Tax – pure class warfare designed to punish Australia’s only remaining growth industry.

Worst government ever, thankfully we won’t have to see them in power again for decades.

emess
emess
12 years ago
Reply to  Yobbo

Worst government ever?

Ok, so decades under the Coalition using high tariffs and subsidies in the fifties and sixties doesn’t count?

Under these Coalition policies, Australia became the poster child for the damage that tariff ‘protection’ and subsidies can cause an economy.

Australia was still producing valve radios at Hendon in SA while the Japanese were exporting transistors. No matter how high the subsidy and tariff by this time, everybody was purchasing Japanese products, and our industry was stuffed. Then came MacMahon – the assertion that the present government is bad (let alone the worst) becomes laughable when compared to Gorton and MacMahon.

I guess that is what happens when people start mistaking entertainment products like the Australian for actual news media.

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

This political struggle is still interesting because Abbott reveals himself as a person who is perhaps unsuitable for national leadership.

His behaviour in parliament grows daily more bizarre one is reminded of John Hewson and the unlovable election, which Hewson lost. Hewson lost it be an immoderate display of personality defects in the final week of the 1993 campaign.

And in comparison with Abbott, Hewson was much more statesmanlike in 1993 than Abbott is in 2012. One can only guess at Abbott’s public demeanour come 2013.

Perhaps if the Libs turned to Turnbull…

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

Damned iPhone. Unlovable = unloseable.

Yobbo
12 years ago

You might be surprised to hear this Katz, but people who aren’t rusted on lefties don’t understand what you mean when you say Abbott’s behaviour is “bizarre”. He seems like a normal person to me.

Of course you haven’t bothered to list any examples, and never will because there really aren’t any.

emess
emess
12 years ago
Reply to  Yobbo

No need to list any Yobbo.

It is perfectly clear from your comments that Abbott would appear ‘normal’ to you.

From your perspective, fair enough.

jennifer
jennifer
12 years ago
Reply to  emess

now I’m really laughing!

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

It doesn’t surprise me that you appear to think that Abbott’s abortive attempt to scurry from the chamber of parliament appears to you to be the act of a balanced individual.

On a more quantifiable level, despite the dominance in the polls of the Coalition, Abbott’s approval numbers remain stubbornly low. The voters smell a mad bastard.

No person not wedded to a desired political outcome could have failed to notice these phenomena.

conrad
conrad
12 years ago

“we won’t have to see them in power again for decades.”

That’s what they said about Krudd and co. too, and at the state level, Baillieu is already on the nose (somewhat unfairly), and it looks like that even the Libs in NSW are just beggining to hit reality. So I think we’ve long past the time when electorates are willing to have the same government for decades, and, for that matter, have any sense of reality in understanding what governments can get done.

Actually, like you, I don’t think Abbott is too abnormal (things like running from the chamber is just silly boy-stuff to me). However, I think in the long term, he is damaging to the Liberal party because the first thing he is going to have to do is cancel a whole bunch of promises, and unless he’s lucky and the economy suddenly perks up when he gets in, which is certainly not guaranteed given the state of the world, it is going to be exceptionally difficult for him to produce any decent budget surplus. So you are going to have a party with a great bunch of broken promises that can’t do exactly what it thinks is most important.

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

If anyone wishes to debate the degree to which Abbott’s personal bizarreness is influencing his low personal approval poll ratings, it might be polite to address Fred Argy’s O/P comments on the subject:

But Newspoll suggests that Abbott’s leadership of the Liberal party is viewed with suspicion by the electorate – for good reasons.

FA suggests that these poor numbers are linked to his poor handling of policy positions. However, it is arguable that these shortcomings should also undermine the popularity of the Opposition. Yet the poll numbers suggest the opposite. Therefore, it is more arguable that The voters’ low esteem of Abbott arises from Abbott’s personality — to wit, his mad behaviour.

conrad
conrad
12 years ago

Katz,

I don’t think Abbott’s behavior is personally bizarre. I assume the reason he has such a low personal ranking is because of a number of things, none of which are really personally bizarre – the non-political ones would be commonly distributed across the normal population and the political ones I assume he thinks are simply tactics that work well (and evidentally they do), so I doubt they have too much to do with his personality.

These include: he often makes thoughtless comments, he does what I called above silly boy-stuff (which is common — just ask Alexander Downer who was obviously afflicted by a similar and commonly found mindset), he is obviously dishonest, he is using the tactic of disgreeing with anything and everything the government does, and he is wiling to promise anything to anyone to get into power. These may well all be dislikable to different sections of the community and compared to other people like Turnbull who doesn’t do any of these things to the extent Abbott does, he probably really is causing the Libs to lose votes.

Apart from that, if it was just electoral appeal, then he gets similar numbers to Gillard, and no-one is claiming she has bizarre personal behavior, so just numbers are not a good indication of personality.

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

Apart from that, if it was just electoral appeal, then he gets similar numbers to Gillard, and no-one is claiming she has bizarre personal behavior, so just numbers are not a good indication of personality.

“Silly boy” behaviour is an indicator or personality. A chap who waggles his willie in public demonstrates an inability to recognise the difference between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.

Gillard’s ratings are low for a variety of reasons. One is the dire performance of her government. Another is bitterness over the handling of Rudd. Another (but not the only other) is personality. Her delivery is wooden and maladroit because she has not married her message to a credible mode of delivering her message. Gillard isn’t bizarre, but she is inarticulate at the level of emotional self-expression.

conrad
conrad
12 years ago

“recognise the difference between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.”

Given that many parliament sessions often look like a bunch of idiots heckling each other, I doubt people really care about acceptable vs. unacceptable (cf. bizarre or uncommon).

Fred Argy
Fred Argy
12 years ago

Thanks John. I have read Gittins. What he is saying is that tax and spending decisions (in the budget years ahead) will be hard to control and may have to rise. But he is not disputing next year’s budget deficit or the one after that. The Opposition is committed to running a bigger budget surplus (or smaller deficit) than Swan. How will he deliver this promise. He won’t tell the rest of Australia until a couple of days before the election!

On a different issue, the Rudd-Gillard governments face a much lower level of PRIVATE debt than in Howard years. So it has been forced to run a larger PUBLIC debt to keep the economy on an even keel. It has been very successful at it – the decline of private debt has been met with larger public debt and this has kept unemployment and inflation fairly stable (contrast this with the rest of the world).

Thanks Simon. I meant to say mining boom (which is fading but not quite spent out).

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

I doubt people really care about acceptable vs. unacceptable (cf. bizarre or uncommon).

Incorrect.

Folks can readily perceive that standard Polly antics in parliament are unacceptable and yet draw no conclusions about the suitability of these politicians as national leaders. 

However, once behaviour of a polly in a position of responsibility is perceived as bizarre, he becomes an electoral liability.

Mark Latham is a leading example. Who can forget The Handshake? This gesture forever labelled him as a nutter. It is possible that “Run Abbott. Run Abbott. Run, run, run!” may do the same to the Member for Manly.

conrad
conrad
12 years ago

Katz, I think you are hanging around left-wing intellectuals too much, who believe the sort of stuff you are saying here and end up preaching to the converted (who are going to vote for Gillard anyway). Personally, I work in a university where there are lots of left-wing intellectuals, and that’s what some of them say and think also. Alternatively, I do have many friends that are from entirely different backgrounds, and I don’t think they care less about things like Mark Lathams handshake (believing he was just a thug was far worse for him). I doubt they even remember it and nor would they be aware of the “Run Rabbit etc..” stuff (I don’t even know where that slogan actually comes from either). It certainly isn’t what comes to my mind when I think of Abbott. Perhaps this is a Sydney thing. So if you think people like Yobbo are somehow exceptional or extreme in their beliefs, I think you’re wrong. A few silly antics like running away from Thompson the “bad smell”, are not going to bother most people.

Patrick
Patrick
12 years ago
Reply to  conrad

Amen. Do left-wing types and journalists actually think a statistically significant part of the population watches question time, or pays attention to the news between 6:05 and 6:15?

Or, incredible as it may seem, that Gillard or Shorten or Rudd are more ‘normal’ to most Australians than Abbott??

Personally, I don’t think I’ve watched ‘news’, except the occasional largely inadvertent glimpses on SBS, for several years now.

Thomas the Tout
Thomas the Tout
12 years ago

Dear Fred,
It would be much better if the ALP got on with governing, rather than opposing the opposition.
A better question might be – “How to respond to Gillard”?
To which I would answer – “just keep her warm until the election – then vote Labor into oblivion”

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

we have the lowest ever misery index.
give me yobbo’s worst government ever anytime.

Fyodor
12 years ago

we have the lowest ever misery index.

No, we don’t – check your data. By that mean actual data, not shit you make up.

Yobbo is right: the best way for the ALP to respond to Abbott is to keep up the good work of ensuring this terminally incompetent government is annihilated at the next election, which can’t come too fucking soon, IMNSHO.

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

Unlike you Conrad, I do not habitually consort with university-cosseted lefties.

My point of entry here isn’t acting out some kind of hatred fetish against my fellow employees.

On the contrary, my point of entry is the yawning gulf between the approval ratings of the Abbott-led Coalition and Abbott himself. These polls tap the opinions of your apolitical mums and dads who you allege pay hardly any attention at all to the theatre bouffe of politics.

Yet, extraordinarily, these very mums and dads place Abbott several standard deviations below the party he leads.

You have offered no credible explanation for this phenomenon. Your myth-making looks suspiciously like leftie-hating irrationality. Have you missed out on a promotion recently?

Katz
Katz
12 years ago

Unlike you Conrad, I do not habitually consort with university-cosseted Tlefties.

My point of entry here isn’t acting out some kind of hatred fetish against my fellow employees.

On the contrary, my point of entry is the yawning gulf between the approval ratings of the Abbott-led Coalition and Abbott himself. These polls tap the opinions of your apolitical mums and dads who you allege pay hardly any attention at all to the theatre bouffe of politics.

Yet, extraordinarily, these very mums and dads place Abbott several standard deviations below the party he leads.

You have offered no credible explanation for this phenomenon. Your myth-making looks suspiciously like leftie-hating irrationality. Have you missed out on a promotion recently?

conrad
conrad
12 years ago

Katz, as it happens, I find my colleagues fine — I’m not sure why you think I don’t — I was just pointing out that your view is well correlated with a certain group, and I’m surprised people believe it. I didn’t say whether I generally agreed/disagreed/liked/disliked etc. that group at all (excluding this particular issue). Anyway, rather than just throw abuse around like you obviously enjoy doing (you’re very like a Catallaxy commentator in reverse — Perhaps you should argue with them more!!), I’ll just note that I said the following about why people dislike Abbott, none of which includes especially bizarre behavior as response to “you have offered no credible explanation for this phenomenon”:

“These include: he often makes thoughtless comments……and he is wiling to promise anything to anyone to get into power….These may well all be dislikable to different sections of the community and compared to other people like Turnbull…”

To this you actually did respond before, so perhaps your memory failed you on this occasion. In addition, as far as I can tell, since you must have realized none of it is particulary bizarre behavior, you then suggested that it was antics and acceptable behavior that mattered (presumably instead of the initial claim). So you are now contradicting yourself within a small number of posts.

Ken Parish
Admin
12 years ago

I agree with Thomas the Tout. PM Gillard is fixated on Mr Abbott like a rabbit caught in a spotlight. Obsessing about how to respond to Abbott is part of the problem not part of the solution.

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

Yes we do Fyodor, ever since 1978 ,when the current labour market statistics came out.

Why am I nor surprised that the genius who believes monetary policy is instantaneous cannot read simple statistics.

Fyodor
12 years ago

Yes we do Fyodor, ever since 1978 ,when the current labour market statistics came out.

You said “lowest ever”, Homerkles, not “since 1978”. Unemployment data is available pre-1978, as is CPI data.

Admit you fucked up your sources again and move on.

Why am I nor surprised that the genius who believes monetary policy is instantaneous cannot read simple statistics.

Why are you not surprised? Possibly because you’re a deluded numpty whose utterly biased torture of “simple statistics” is legendarily incompetent.

Not only, but also: “believes monetary policy is instantaneous”? Where am I supposed to have written that? Produce the quotation or admit you lied. Again.

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

Fyodor ,

Wrong AGAIN.

There is a reason I said 1978 as anyone who understands labour statistics would understand.

Oh dear our forgetful person doesn’t remember his reasons why retail trade turnover rose substantially in December 2008 and a little later.

Certainly Central Banks around the world, economics lecturers and writers of monetary textbooks were astonished at how quickly Fyodor thought monetary policy could affect an economy.

Why for only two months wee affected he never explained.

The Journal of economic literature is awaiting your script in breathless anticipation.

Fyodor
12 years ago

Wrong AGAIN.

There is a reason I said 1978 as anyone who understands labour statistics would understand.

Nope. Linking to Grog’s Gamut does not in any way prove your earlier assertion, as he likewise only captures the “misery index” from 1978. Why you chose that point as the commencement of Australia’s economic history is painfully obvious, Homerkles, but does not prove your point. The reality is that the unemployment rate and CPI inflation were regularly – and often materially – lower than today in the decades before stagflation in the 1970s.

Your assertion is thus simply, factually wrong.

Oh dear our forgetful person doesn’t remember his reasons why retail trade turnover rose substantially in December 2008 and a little later.

Certainly Central Banks around the world, economics lecturers and writers of monetary textbooks were astonished at how quickly Fyodor thought monetary policy could affect an economy.

Why for only two months wee affected he never explained.

The Journal of economic literature is awaiting your script in breathless anticipation.

Squib. Quotation, please. You know how this game works, Homerkles. You can make it a short or a long process, but the end result is always the same because, well, you know.

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

yes I know how it works,

you make a stupid statement , then runaway from it pretending to have alzheimer’s just like now.

Actually I am wrong with regard to the misery index.

It should start at either 1992 or 1996 depending whether you want to compare apples with apples with regard to inflation and whether you regard to change to the labour survey in 1996 a better survey methodology.

Fyodor
12 years ago

yes I know how it works,

you make a stupid statement , then runaway from it pretending to have alzheimer’s just like now.

You’re the one running away from your own “stupid statement”. You claim I said something, then refuse to substantiate the claim. Either prove your claim or concede. Simple.

Actually I am wrong with regard to the misery index.

Of course you are. But you couldn’t leave it at that, could you?

It should start at either 1992 or 1996 depending whether you want to compare apples with apples with regard to inflation and whether you regard to change to the labour survey in 1996 a better survey methodology.

Rhubarb, rhubarb, rhubarb. The data shows you’re wrong. Get over it.

JC
JC
12 years ago

Not only, but also: “believes monetary policy is instantaneous”? Where am I supposed to have written that? Produce the quotation or admit you lied. Again.

Homes, I think you’re confused here, as to may have said something like that. Was it possibly me you’re thinking of?

What I said is that if you follow gradualist monetary policy you get gradualist responses. We’ve seen quite good evidence that when the markets believe a central bank such as the Fed means serious business the discounting impact is instantaneous.

You obviously have other… ideas.. right?

That’s from me, but it basically echoes Scott Sumner’s thesis on NGDP targeting.

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

er no it doesn’t.

Using the better labour market data and of course the RBA underlying inflation data we are at the lowest we have seen.

gosh Fyodor you can’t even remember saying at this blog the elephant in the room about 2008 was the cut in rates.

I said at the time you made that stupid statement it would mean the shortest lag in the history of the world.

Why people with a mortgage would splurge out in only two months you never fully explained

Fyodor
12 years ago

test

Fyodor
12 years ago

er no it doesn’t.

Using the better labour market data and of course the RBA underlying inflation data we are at the lowest we have seen.

Continually asserting that later data proves your point does not prove your point.

Post-WWII data to the ’70’s shows you are simply and factually wrong. Prove otherwise or concede.

gosh Fyodor you can’t even remember saying at this blog the elephant in the room about 2008 was the cut in rates.

I said at the time you made that stupid statement it would mean the shortest lag in the history of the world.

Why people with a mortgage would splurge out in only two months you never fully explained

First it’s “instantaneous monetary policy”, then it’s “retail sales” and now it’s “the elephant”. FFFS get your story straight, find the actual quotation and quit this pathetic squibbage.

As for memory, the last time you tried that line on me it ended with another of your public humiliations as you squibbed yet again. The irony is that you’re probably too stupid and forgetful to remember it. As I proved then and will keep proving to you, my memory is vastly superior to yours. Thus every time we take a walk down memory lane you’ll find me there laughing at you.

JB Cairns
JB Cairns
12 years ago

up to the 70s that is when there is no RBA underlying rate only a headline CPI to work with.

kinds misses the point , just like your vacuous argument!

your stupidity is all over the place. you said it not me and here .

Gee your memory loss is always convenient

Fyodor
12 years ago

up to the 70s that is when there is no RBA underlying rate only a headline CPI to work with.

Irrelevant. As the ABS’ headline CPI inflation was not particularly volatile during a large chunk of the period before 1978, notably the 1960s, the absence of RBA’s various “underlying” measures makes no difference to the question at hand.

You’re just clutching at straws. Pathetic.

kinds misses the point , just like your vacuous argument!

Oh, the irony.

your stupidity is all over the place. you said it not me and here .

Incoherent babble. And you’re accusing me of stupidity? Just laughable.

Gee your memory loss is always convenient

This from a bloke who can’t back up his own “memory”. Comedy gold.

paul walter
paul walter
12 years ago

Having read the thread, I confirm the diagnosis of other reasonable commenters here, that Abbott is as daft as cut snake.
Although my reading is that the actual problem is more in the form of a personality disorder that renders him devoid of empathy with others, rather than something like bipolarity or neurosis that indicates a wholly formed entity under stress.
With Abbott, that elusive spark that defines “humanity” is what’s missing, the entity, was never completed in the first place.

Pedro
Pedro
12 years ago

You know the guy do you Paul? Made those observations at first hand? You might as well have “sorry, I’m a bit dim” tattooed on your forehead.

There are genuine questions about Abbott, but those are not remotely valid claims. On the bright side, he hasn’t yet proved himself a cowardly liar like the PM. Or a stupid and mendacious fuck like the treasurer for that matter.

It seems to bear repeating the list because some people can’t get past wish-fulfillment:
Carbon tax – pointless hair-shirt
RSPT/MRRT – a policy delivery fuck up of grand proportions embodied in a bag of lies about the facts of the constitution
NBN – money is apparently no object in the face of a global recession
FWA – the repudiation of the modern work place
Thomson – morals, what morals
Stimulus program – if the RBA is raising rates then it’s face-cutting for nose-spiting.

And let’s not forget the triumphs of honesty and policy like the Timor announcement, the billionaire bashing.

What I find remarkable is the number of time recently when talking to people I barely know, or have just met, and they swing the conversation around to just how crap the govt is.

jennifer
jennifer
12 years ago

Carbon tax – pointless hair-shirt or the beginning of a new paradigm regarding energy use and awareness
RSPT/MRRT – a policy delivery fuck up of grand proportions embodied in a bag of lies about the facts of the constitution or an opportunity to share the proceeds of a national resource.
NBN – money is apparently no object in the face of a global recession or fibre is an infrastructure investment that will support communications technology for at least another 20 years.
FWA – the repudiation of the modern work place – yes, but vulnerable citizens should be protected from unfair dismissal and I agree small business should not be strangled by regulation.
Thomson – morals, what morals or it will only matter if he is convicted and still sitting.
Stimulus program – if the RBA is raising rates then it’s face-cutting for nose-spiting but I think the RBA have cut interest rates….

You see there is a bright side too!

Pedro
Pedro
12 years ago

Sorry Jen, but no sign of that new paradigm setting in around the world and nobody can deny that it will result in lower growth in this country for nil effect of world GHGs. On the mining tax, I didn’t say mineral profits shouldn’t be taxed higher, there are arguments both ways, I said the delivery of the tax has been a complete fuck up. On the NBN, you’ve completely missed the point about whether costs matter. Your response to FWA is irrelevant to the point I made, and hey, what’s the dole for anyway. The conviction or otherwise of Thomson is irrelevant to the question of whether the ALP should have worked so hard to protect him given the evidence against him. The RBA raised rates when the stimulus was really starting to kick in and only recently started to ease again.

jennifer
jennifer
12 years ago
Reply to  Pedro

Regarding the ‘delivery fuck-up’ are you referring to a lack of consultation with the states? – You know what the states are like – the premiers, especially the WA premiers will baulk at any Cth incursion on what they regard as their jurisdiction.
Regarding the unconstitutionality of the tax – the minerals, once out of the ground become the property of the corporation – and as such are taxable by the Cth. The reason Twiggy hasn’t run the case is because he could never win.

Pedro
Pedro
12 years ago
Reply to  jennifer

Yes, the lack of consultation was a complete fuck up. The claim that the resources belong to all australians, they belong to the states and this is a federation, and that is the constitutional point. I think the original settings proposed for the RSPT were wrong, but that is an arguable point and plenty here will disagree.

Yobbo
12 years ago

Pretty much every left-wingers response when asked about Abbott is “I just don’t like him/personality problems/the vibe”.

Of course you don’t like him – he’s a liberal. But really, are there any actual examples of things he’s done badly that you’d like to share? (apart from joining the liberal party).

conrad
conrad
12 years ago

Yobbo, if I had to choose one factor for the reason that people don’t like him, even in comparison to other Libs (I think there a number of factors noted above), then it is because he runs a very aggressive negative campaign. This looks bad for him but is obviously works and is worse for the Labor party (although it’s hard to work out what the balance is — obviously Labor is pretty bad for itself). I very much doubt this is reflective of his own personality, and I assume he just does it based on the best advice to win the election, and he is obviously willing to modulate his behavior based on this and his awareness of how some people perceive him.

A good example of this behavior modulation was the sudden change in his attitude to boat-people. He went from all out attack mode to suddenly not saying much, and I assume that this is because some advisor had decided that scoring points on that issue was making him look too nasty, and it’s not like Labor hadn’t created any number of other issues on which he could score points that didn’t involve vulnerable people and hence wouldn’t look so bad for him (e.g., carbon tax etc.).