The Modular Nature of Trustworthiness Detection
By: Bonnefon, Jean-François (Centre national de la recherche scientifique)
De Neys, Wim (Centre national de la recherche scientifique)
Hopfensitz, Astrid (TSE)The capacity to trust wisely is a critical facilitator of success and prosperity, and it has been conjectured that people of higher intelligence were better able to detect signs of untrustworthiness from potential partners. In contrast, this article reports five Trust Game studies suggesting that reading trustworthiness on the faces of strangers is a modular process. Trustworthiness detection from faces is independent of general intelligence (Study 1) and effortless (Study 2). Pictures that include non-facial features such as hair and clothing impair trustworthiness detection (Study 3) by increasing reliance on conscious judgments (Study 4), but people largely prefer to make decisions from this sort of pictures (Study 5). In sum, trustworthiness detection in an economic interaction is a genuine and effortless ability, possessed in equal amount by people of all cognitive capacities, but whose impenetrability leads to inaccurate conscious judgments and inappropriate informational preferences.
Recent Comments
- john walker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- Not Trampis on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- David Walker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- Nicholas Gruen on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- R. N. England on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- Chris Lloyd on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- R. N. England on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on Sotto Voce: The case for an informal vote
- A lucky boy from a golden age of economics | Club Troppo on Scaleability and the knowledge economy: or the micro-economics of hyper-bullshit
- Chris Lloyd on Sotto Voce: The case for an informal vote
- john walker on Sotto Voce: The case for an informal vote
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Categories
-
Authors
Archives
Author login and feeds
Academic
Alternative media (Australian)
Alternative media (international)
Arts
Business
Centrist
Economics and public policy
Left-leaning
Legal
Online media digests
Psephology/elections
Right-leaning
I have for some time thought that the prime minister is seriously disadvantaged by make-up and dress style which obscures her expression and character. Where are her micro-expressions?… A subject about which Paul Ekman is the pioneer writer
Mind you, I think capacity to discern trust has become drowned in the fever of the times.
An article in the current New York Review of Books about Texas politics seems relevant to Australia, especially this bit:
The language out there, the fever out there, is getting worse as this blogger reports and laments:
http://www.edenriley.com/2012/06/women-in-politics-foreign-aid-and.html
Trust is now a minority concept.
Nicholas
sounds very interesting ….
But do not have time today/tomorrow to read it.
A possibly related thing is that the most critical thing in a painting a recognisable likeness is getting the mouth right, eyes are not as important ….. until about 9 months baby’s recognise their mothers by their mothers mouth , cover eyes and the baby will still recognise her mum but cover the mouth and the baby will cry and shy away .
This has been doing the rounds …
http://www.gallup.com/poll/155258/Confidence-Public-Schools-New-Low.aspx
It’s from the US of course, but confidence in US public schools has an almost linear downward trend over 40 years. Recent confidence in every institution you care to name is down: churches, banks, justice, and the television news are all looking kind of sad. Maybe we should start thinking about finding someone to blame, before it all gets worse?
Congress ranks last of course. I bet that shocks everyone.
Getting back to the article at hand, kind of interesting. I can’t help thinking that the more people study this stuff, the more we discover both opportunities to exploit other people and also mechanisms for defence (an arms race in other words) but I’m sure it keeps the research funds flowing (as will any arms race).