Diminishing marginal productivity

The picture below is of a mountainous area in Spain. It used to be full of small-scale farmers and is now almost deserted. Over the many centuries that farmers have tried to eek something useful out of this area, they created terraces all the way to the top of the mountains. In order to reach the top terrace, a farmer would have to walk up each morning and down each evening, spending his day cleaning out stones from the terraces and tending to the crops. You can imagine how little marginal productivity the top terrace is hence worth.

By comparison, the bottom terraces are easier to reach, on less stony ground, and with more water on it. The marginal value of spending an hour on them is much higher.

You should hence not be surprised to hear that over the last century, nearly all the farmers in this region have left to work in the cities and do something more productive. Only at the bottom of the mountain are there farmers left and they only use the most fertile bit.

Where does the food come from to feed all the people who stopped farming, you might wonder? Well, some additional food comes from improved production methods on the bit that is still used, but the vast majority comes from other areas with land that is much easier to cultivate. Hence not only are you looking at a classic example of marginal productivity in action, but also at a classic example of how reduced costs of transport have lead to a whole region adjusting its production decisions.

This entry was posted in Economics and public policy, Environment, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gavin R Putland
Gavin R Putland
9 years ago

You are also looking at a classic(al) example of another “margin”: the margin of cultivation.

derrida derider
derrida derider
9 years ago

Aren’t we confusing the marginal product of labour and the marginal product of land here? You’d expect that wih more people eating, less productive land would be brought into use. With more people richer (ie having higher opportuntiy costs for their labour), less productive labour (ie climbing hills) would be disdained.

In this case the latter effect has prevailed and the margin of cultivation has moved downwards, but it’s not a priori inevitable. If the world gets hungry enough (ie the real price of food rises) then maybe someone will start to find the hours used getting to them worthwhile.

But it is fascinating to see Ricardo playing out on the landscape.

Grant Musgrove
9 years ago

yes, but what is the relevant framework for the inefficient waste of edible food see