Above is a panel discussion on the sharing economy with Jim Minifie, Ian Harper and me. There was a lot of good feedback on it after the event, so I was pleased to see it up on the Grattan website.
Recent Comments
- Nicholas Gruen on Minority government would be no bad thing
- John on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- David Walker on Big infrastructure, big uncertainty
- John on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- Geoff Edwards on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- John Quiggin on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Not Trampis on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- Ken Parish on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- John on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- John on Nuclear power – nirvana or nonsense?
- Nicholas Gruen on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Ken Parish on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Ken Parish on Returning to blogging at Troppo
- Ken Parish on Anyone know a good web designer?
- Geoff Edwards on Anyone know a good web designer?
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Categories
-
Authors
Archives
Author login and feeds
Academic
Alternative media (Australian)
Alternative media (international)
Arts
Business
Centrist
Economics and public policy
Left-leaning
Legal
Online media digests
Psephology/elections
Right-leaning
A bit long to watch the whole thing, but an interesting issue. From a mainstream economic point of view, the peer-to-peer technologies make the economy closer to the perfect market ideal as they take out a lot of middle men. From a political economy point of view, they make it harder to corner any market without co-optation of the government. At the same time, the reduced transaction costs combine markets across time and space and thus increase the size of the pie to be captured, so the indirectly increase the incentives to capture the government. Patent wars between tech giants is a good example of such attempts at capture.
Thanks Paul, agreed it’s too long to watch – though it turns out I did touch on your last point about patents.