We use a novel method to measure racism at both the individual and the country level. We show that our measure of racism has a strong negative and significant impact on economic development, quality of institutions and education. We then test different hypotheses concerning the origin of racism and its channels of impact in order to establish causality. We find that racism is not correlated with any possible measure of coexistence of different racial or ethnic groups, like ethno-linguistic fragmentation, share of migrants, or ethnically-motivated conflicts among others. Racism has a negative effect on social capital measured as generalized trust and voice and accountability. More importantly, we show that for former colonies, racism is strongly correlated with the presence of extractive institutions during the colonial time, even when we control for current institutions, current GDP per capita or current education. We argue that extractive colonial institutions not only had a negative impact on the political and economic institutions of the colonized countries, but also shaped the cultural values of the population. We claim that colonial powers instilled racism among the population of their colonies in order to weaken their ability for collective action, justify their own role as extractive elite in the eyes of the ruled and facilitate the internal cohesion of the elite. We also show that, at the individual level and using country fixed effects, racism is negatively correlated with those cultural values that one would expect if an extractive elite would be able to decide the cultural values of the society they control: lower trust, higher obedience, lower respect for others, lower feeling of control of one’s live, lower preference for democracy, higher support for military intervention of the government, lower preference for political participation, lower valuation of civil rights, higher preference for state intervention in the economy, lower support for economic competition, and higher acceptance of dishonest behavior. We finally show that racism still has a significant impact on our outcome variables even when we control for these potential cultural correlates.
Recent Comments
- john walker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- Not Trampis on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- David Walker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- Nicholas Gruen on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- R. N. England on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- Chris Lloyd on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- R. N. England on The Voice For John Stuart Mill
- johnrwalker on Sotto Voce: The case for an informal vote
- A lucky boy from a golden age of economics | Club Troppo on Scaleability and the knowledge economy: or the micro-economics of hyper-bullshit
- Chris Lloyd on Sotto Voce: The case for an informal vote
- john walker on Sotto Voce: The case for an informal vote
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Categories
-
Authors
Archives
Author login and feeds
Academic
Alternative media (Australian)
Alternative media (international)
Arts
Business
Centrist
Economics and public policy
Left-leaning
Legal
Online media digests
Psephology/elections
Right-leaning
Table 1 and figure 1 make for interesting reading!
Looks like Booker T. had social workers down pat.
Thanks Tony,
I actually think the way it’s put doesn’t quite describe social workers.
They want to help people, just so long as the people they’re helping cooperate in being noble savages, relate to young graduates with clipboards and make all their demands on social workers within reasonable office hours.