Recent Comments
- Vox pop journalism as a system of domination: Peter Dutton edition | Club Troppo on Journalism as a system of domination: Syriza edition
- Orwell that ends well: Can evaluation save us from ourselves? | Club Troppo on Family by Family: the column
- Nicholas Gruen on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Nicholas Gruen on Building the public goods of the 21st century: Google DeepMind edition
- Antonios Sarhanis on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Moz on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Why I’m not reading Steven Pinker’s latest | Club Troppo on GPI part two
- Why I’m not reading Steven Pinker’s latest | Club Troppo on What’s wrong with the Genuine Progress Indicator? Part One
- Not Trampis on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- R. N. England on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- John walker on Universal basic income: notes of an agnostic
- David Walker on Universal basic income: notes of an agnostic
- David Walker on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- Conrad on Should Liz Cheney be your hero?
- John walker on Elections are all about competition right? (They weren’t way back when)
Categories
-
Authors
Archives
Author login and feeds
Academic
Alternative media (Australian)
Alternative media (international)
Arts
Business
Centrist
Economics and public policy
Left-leaning
Legal
Online media digests
Psephology/elections
Right-leaning
Sport
Tag Archives: artists resale royalty
Artists Resale Royalties: a piece of pie…
The ARR scheme so far has cost taxpayers just over $2.2 million and as of December 2013 has delivered a total of 7,800 royalty payments, to 800 artists (or estates) with a median value of about $105 per payment. The … Continue reading
Artists Resale Royalties: on bullshit, part three
Australia’s Artists Resale Royalty (ARR ) scheme has so far cost taxpayers $2.2 million in direct support. And over many years the publicly funded lobbyists for this scheme, headed up by the National Association for the Visual Arts Ltd, have … Continue reading
Labors damaging legacy to the visual arts
The following quote is from an article published in London’s Financial Times on October 4. The article is further confirmation that the previous Labor government’s gratuitous interference in the art market has had a devastating effect on sales and its … Continue reading