Update - Tweets placed in a more coherent context in In search of Qanilingus at CDU Law and Business Online.
NB Australian Financial Review arguably has the best coverage and has no paywall for the weekend.
downesyStephen Downes
by CDUlawschool
Alan Joyce's secret ambition is to pursue a merger between #Qantas and his old airline, Aer Lingus. It would be known as Qanilingus
AequoEtBonoAngus M-a-c-i-n-n-is
by CDUlawschool
@
KJBarKaren Barlow
by CDUlawschool
@
leigh_howardleigh_howard
by CDUlawschool
leigh_howardleigh_howard
by CDUlawschool
Appln under s 424(d). Never been used in history. Govt could have jumped this step by declaring grounding void under s 431. #Qantas
AequoEtBonoAngus M-a-c-i-n-n-is
by CDUlawschool
So Qantas' go-to silk, Harry Dixon SC, was in Melbourne today? What a lucky coincidence!
leigh_howardleigh_howard
by CDUlawschool
sallysaraABCSally Sara
by CDUlawschool
3 Australian soldiers killed, 7 wounded in shooting by attacker dressed in Afghan National Army uniform. Shah Wali Kot, Kandahar province.
CDUlawschoolCDU Law School
Meanwhile: "Microsoft buys Skype, attacks reverse engineer with bogus takedown notices and florid language" tiny.cc/ki6ii >
CDUlawschoolCDU Law School
tiny.cc/shggd "no one at Qantas to blame, not workers or management..faced with horrid reality of competitive global airline business
CDUlawschoolCDU Law School
FWA s424 tiny.cc/y4y3j - would end union action as well as lockout. Probably that's what Joyce was aiming at - high stakes poker
profsarahjSarah Joseph
by CDUlawschool
CDUlawschoolCDU Law School
From 8pm AEDT on 31/10 Qantas will lock out all employees covered by the new ALAEA, TWU and AIPA agreement. bit.ly/23SFRn
CDUlawschoolCDU Law School
Qantas: total chaos and massive self-inflicted losses. For the latest, check Crikey's aviation guru Ben Sandilands bit.ly/sjQkNu
peterjblackPeter Black
by CDUlawschool
AequoEtBonoAngus M-a-c-i-n-n-is
by CDUlawschool
And while I'm tweeting FWA sections, this is why you can't sue #qantas for any loss you suffer: bit.ly/t0eEG3
Well done Alan Joyce and Qantas board. It's about time employers in this country developed a bit of backbone against union blackmail and bloody-mindedness. If the strikes had gone on Qantas would have ended up as another Ansett, and you'd have all these unionists sobbing about losing their jobs and entitlements. Even the far-left Dick Smith is blaming the unionists.
My take. Occupy Qantas, fight the one percent. http://enpassant.com.au/?p=11458
What nonsense in your link, John. The 'pittance' being paid to Qantas employees? Baggage handlers getting $80000 annually and some pilots getting over $500,000. Salaries much higher than those at Virgin but still they want more. How on earth can a company selling an internationally traded good compete successfully with these costs? Answer: They cannot.
The real world comes lumbering in and suddenly it's panic stations. China exports more than just machinery, appliances and credit.
so apparently virgin can successfully negotiate an agreement that includes flexibility but Qantas cannot.
What does Qantas have that Virgin doesn't.
An overpaid CEO who got an increase of over 70% based on comparative wage justice not performance.
so lockout are good but strikes are bad. nice logic again.
Homer, would you give the unions their claims?
An old mate of mine was an Ansett hostie and then became one of the union stewards. I saw him the other day and he was still whinging about how the company had done the wrong thing by the employees.
Why can Virgin negotiate a 'flexible' EBA yet Qantas clearly cannot.
Only an imbecile could believe Qantas has any credibility on keeping wages down after the ridiculous increase given to the CEO.
how can they cry poor after that.
Unions need the suport of their members and my guess is they simply do not believe Qantas management.
Of course they did the wrong thing by employees. Most employees suffered loss of entitlements when by gross dereliction of management Ansett drove itself into bankruptcy. The first duty of a board of directors is to keep the company afloat to keep faith with its staff.
Ken, if you are there, what do you think of the s.431 argument? I should have thought that a ministerial direction would still be more certain than a reference to the tribunal on the grounds that the review is not on the merits. But perhaps judicial review is different for the Feds or the FWA.