From the soon to be published "PISA 2012 Results: Creative Problem Solving", OECD
-
About
Economic, legal, political and social commentary.
-
Categories
- Economics and public policy (1866)
- Uncategorized (1445)
- Uncategorised (1118)
- Politics - national (1000)
- Politics - international (624)
- History (397)
- Law (383)
- Life (383)
- Philosophy (383)
- Political theory (375)
- Society (300)
- Missing Link (269)
- Cultural Critique (262)
- IT and Internet (258)
- Media (232)
- Education (219)
- Humour (206)
- Films and TV (193)
-
Archives by Year
-
Posts by Author
- Nicholas Gruen (3063)
- Ken Parish (1440)
- Don Arthur (505)
- Paul Frijters (347)
- Mark Bahnisch (272)
- James Farrell (159)
- Tony Harris (152)
- Geoff Honnor (136)
- David Walker (124)
- Richard Tsukamasa Green (121)
- Fred Argy (113)
- Wicking (110)
- Wayne Wood (105)
- Rex Ringschott (95)
- Sophie Masson (67)
- Cam (63)
- Ingolf Eide (52)
- Scott Wickstein (43)
- Unknown (34)
- Chris Lloyd (33)
- Paul Bamford (aka Gummo T) (33)
- Stephen Hill (24)
- john r walker (20)
- Patrick (20)
- Rafe Champion (18)
- Saul Eslake (16)
- Shaun Cronin (16)
- Roop Sandhu (13)
- Dr Troppo (12)
- Peter Whiteford (12)
- Antonios Sarhanis (10)
- Bruce Bradbury (10)
- Backroom Girl (7)
- john Walker (7)
- Danielle McCredden (6)
- B Model Baby (5)
- Damian Jeffree (5)
- Gaby (5)
- Julia (5)
- Seamus C (5)
- JC (4)
- Luke Slawomirski (4)
- Paul Watson (4)
- James Wheeldon (3)
- Jen (3)
- Paul Martin (3)
- Darlene (2)
- davidsligar (2)
- ellenbroad (2)
- Mike Waller (2)
- David Coles (1)
- Joshua Gans (1)
- meika loofs samorzewski (1)
- Sam Roggeveen (1)

I have literally no clue what this means.
Is non routine manual , a type of car ?
weird graphs to bunch together! They are really hard to read without more explanation.
If I were to guess, the first one shows cumulative change in inputs (presumably measured by on-the-job questionnaires or implicit from a mapping from changes in industry composition to task-composition by industry). The second looks like a cumulative change too, but then relative to the 1960 distribution (which is something quite different from the first: the changes in inputs might be a lot lower or bigger than in the first graph depending on the variation in that 1960 distribution). And the third is in a much smaller scale (single digit percentages versus tens of percentages in the other two), so one would presume we are then looking at average annual changes, though god knows what the 'across occupations' bit means.
All in all, a bizarre trio to stick together. Creative though. Probably the only way they could get the lines to look similar.
Have a read of some related articles to explore the background:
http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2013/10/jobs-will-automated-future.html
http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2013/07/carving-out-the-middle-the-risks-from-the-polarization-of-work.html