-
About
Economic, legal, political and social commentary.
-
Categories
- Economics and public policy (1866)
- Uncategorized (1445)
- Uncategorised (1118)
- Politics - national (1000)
- Politics - international (624)
- History (397)
- Law (383)
- Life (383)
- Philosophy (383)
- Political theory (375)
Show all categories
- Society (300)
- Missing Link (269)
- Cultural Critique (262)
- IT and Internet (258)
- Media (232)
- Education (219)
- Humour (206)
- Films and TV (193)
- Democracy (167)
- Science (153)
- Literature (139)
- Print media (139)
- Innovation (131)
- Art and Architecture (125)
- Politics - Northern Territory (120)
- Health (117)
- Journalism (110)
- Religion (110)
- Environment (103)
- Web and Government 2.0 (98)
- regulation (94)
- Blegs (90)
- Climate Change (88)
- Geeky Musings (86)
- Ned the Bear (77)
- Sport-general (77)
- Chess (73)
- Ethics (73)
- Music (71)
- Bargains (66)
- Social Policy (66)
- Miscellaneous (62)
- Gender (59)
- Coronavirus crisis (56)
- Business (54)
- Death and taxes (53)
- Information (53)
- Social (52)
- Metablogging (50)
- Sortition and citizens’ juries (50)
- Libertarian Musings (44)
- Best From Elsewhere (42)
- Immigration and refugees (41)
- Theatre (40)
- Sport - rugby (37)
- Employment (35)
- Public and Private Goods (32)
- Race and indigenous (26)
- Terror (25)
- Bullshit (23)
- Inequality (23)
- WOW! - Amazing (23)
- Intellectual Property (22)
- Medical (21)
- Dance (20)
- Interesting Graphs (20)
- Ask Troppo's Love Gods (19)
- Parenting (19)
- bubble (16)
- Competitions (16)
- Food (16)
- Indigenous (15)
- Methodology (14)
- Sport - Rugby League (14)
- Space (12)
- Isegoria (10)
- Personal (10)
- Blogs TNG (9)
- Travel (9)
- Intellectual Monopoly Privileges (8)
- Review (8)
- Site News (7)
- Firms (4)
- Criminal law (3)
- Products (2)
- recovery of old post (2)
- repost for the record (2)
- War and military (2)
- Startup (1)
-
Archives by Year
-
Posts by Author
- Nicholas Gruen (3063)
- Ken Parish (1440)
- Don Arthur (505)
- Paul Frijters (347)
- Mark Bahnisch (272)
- James Farrell (159)
- Tony Harris (152)
- Geoff Honnor (136)
- David Walker (124)
- Richard Tsukamasa Green (121)
- Fred Argy (113)
- Wicking (110)
- Wayne Wood (105)
- Rex Ringschott (95)
- Sophie Masson (67)
- Cam (63)
- Ingolf Eide (52)
- Scott Wickstein (43)
- Unknown (34)
- Chris Lloyd (33)
- Paul Bamford (aka Gummo T) (33)
- Stephen Hill (24)
- john r walker (20)
- Patrick (20)
- Rafe Champion (18)
- Saul Eslake (16)
- Shaun Cronin (16)
- Roop Sandhu (13)
- Dr Troppo (12)
- Peter Whiteford (12)
- Antonios Sarhanis (10)
- Bruce Bradbury (10)
- Backroom Girl (7)
- john Walker (7)
- Danielle McCredden (6)
- B Model Baby (5)
- Damian Jeffree (5)
- Gaby (5)
- Julia (5)
- Seamus C (5)
- JC (4)
- Luke Slawomirski (4)
- Paul Watson (4)
- James Wheeldon (3)
- Jen (3)
- Paul Martin (3)
- Darlene (2)
- davidsligar (2)
- ellenbroad (2)
- Mike Waller (2)
- David Coles (1)
- Joshua Gans (1)
- meika loofs samorzewski (1)
- Sam Roggeveen (1)
Siegbert Tarrasch plays a great move
Posted in Chess


So who's worked out the move without looking. I certainly didn't. It's a rip snorter.
I wonder, do I give myself net credit for thinking of it, or net dunce's hats for writing it off almost as quickly? Surely the latter, unfortunately :(
I wonder, is this just the kind of move that we are amazed by but that a computer would always see?
And if you think about the move, most variants end up in the immortal game format - which is to say with the winner's remaining pieces all in the mate of the enemy king.
That's the classic game they have in my family's edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica, though less for this move than what comes before it (ie, the demonstration of the classical principles of development and centralisation.)