Coal pollution and health before WWI

Research Design Meets Market Design: Using Centralized Assignment for Impact Evaluation
Date: 2016-12
By: Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila (Duke University) ; Angrist, Joshua (MIT) ; Narita, Yusuke (Yale University) ; Pathak, Parag A. (MIT)
Atmospheric pollution was an important side effect of coal-fired industrialisation in the nineteenth century. In Britain emissions of black smoke were on the order of fifty times as high as they were a century later. In this paper we examine the effects of these emissions on child development by analysing the heights on enlistment during the First World War of men born in England and Wales in the 1890s. We use the occupational structure to measure the coal intensity of the districts in which these men were observed as children in the 1901 census. We find strong negative effects of coal intensity on height, which amounts to difference of almost an inch between the most and least polluted localities. These results are robust to a variety of specification tests and they are consistent with the notion that the key channel of influence on height was via respiratory infection. The subsequent reduction of emissions from coal combustion is one factor contributing to the improvement in health (and the in-crease in height) during the twentieth century.

This entry was posted in Economics and public policy, Environment. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Coal pollution and health before WWI

  1. conrad says:

    When I used to live in Hong Kong they had a lot of data on the effect of air pollution on children (a large part of which was coal). The figures were appalling — if I remember correctly, around 40% of children had developmental lung problems and there were numerous other reported short term, long term and permanent side effects (including death due to cancer). In this respect, losing one inch of height is a minor worry!

    • Nicholas Gruen says:

      By the way Conrad, you still seem to be in the robot’s bad books, but I periodically remove your comments from moderation so please keep making them.

      I’m not sure what you’ve done to offend the algorithms but I can only presume it was bad. Very Bad.

  2. john Walker says:

    the correct link for the paper is

Comments are closed.