Crikey reminder

OK, this post will stick, irritatingly, to the top of the front page for this week to let you all know that I’ll  be sending off the Crikey subs soon. One reason for the reminder is that I’m surprised that I’ve received less interest this year – is Crikey sliding in popularity? Are its price hikes starting to discourage readers? Perhaps Troppo is sliding in popularity. In any event, we have 32 takers this year so far compared with around 60 or so last year. Last drinks peeps. I’ll send the list off to Crikey next week. My email address again. ngruen is the handle and gmail.com is the domain.

Giving to the wealthy

I’m not much of a fan of giving to wealthy causes. Like private schools for the well healed. I was asked to attend an interview to see if I’d go on the Council of my daughter’s private school – which I said I would. I was then asked if I was Jewish (it’s an Anglican School) and said that I wasn’t but that I was a bit shocked to be asked. I didn’t bore the Principal with the details of my religious status as a lapsed atheist. Anyway with that apparently smoothed over I was invited to an evening which turned out to be hard core fund raising.

A donation of 20K seemed in order, but was not forthcoming. And for whatever reason my candidature didn’t proceed any further. (I also opined on a tour of the campus that I thought it would be a pity if they ripped out the only remaining grass covered oval and replaced it with synthetic grass, no matter how much truer it made they hockey balls travel.)

Today I got an invitation to give money to Ormond College where I spent a year. It was cleverly crafted – written to me by someone in my year with a personal note to me. This was my chance to make a difference for the next generation. I could contribute to allowing someone hard of means to attend the College. Well that’s better than contributing to someone easy of means I guess. Anyway it transpired that to qualify, this person who was hard of means had to be someone whose parents had attended Ormond. And yes, they might have been hard of means, but then they might just have been good at minimising their income. I decided to pass.

Computer nudges: not always a big success

I tend to avoid business class even when entitled to it except for overnight flights, but being entitled to business class travel on a government board the computer always requires me to explain myself. And though it has an option where you can say that you’re entitled to fly at a higher class, it doesn’t have an option to allow you to explain that you’re happy enough with a lower class fare. So much so that the computer decided to take a couple of hours out of my life and nearly three times as much off the government in order to send me business class. So I had to tell the system that I was overriding it, though, since none of the pull down reasons were the reason I was doing what I was doing, I picked “LPF/IBF ACCEPTED “. No doubt a reader can tell me what that means, but I had no idea. At least I wasn’t telling a lie as I would have been by choosing any of the other options which I knew were wrong. Seemed to do the trick.
Flight (MELBOURNE to CANBERRA): Wed 21 Mar 2012
Airline Depart Arrival Flight No. Stops Fare Type Price
19:00 20:05 QF822 0 FULLY FLEXIBLE *P AUD $333.83
Best Available Fare In Policy
Airline Depart Arrival Flight No. Stops Fare Type Price
Sector 1 - MELBOURNE to SYDNEY
19:00 20:25 QF462 0 BUSINESS  *P  AUD$1,031.00
Sector 2 - SYDNEY to CANBERRA
21:10 22:05 QF807 0
Cheaper fare selected outside of policy.
Change flight to Best Fare:
Please select reason for not choosing best fare:                                       Please select a reason…                                                                      LPF/IBF ACCEPTED                                                                      APPROVAL/ENTITLEMENT TO TRAVEL AT HIGHER FARE CLASS                                                                      REQUIRE FLEXIBILITY TO CHANGE BOOKING                                                                      HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES – PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITIES                                                                      UNSUITABLE DUE TO TIME ROUTING OR CONNECTIONS